國立虎尾科技大學 |

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption./
作者:	Yildiz, Bilgehan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (230 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438140332

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.
Yildiz, Bilgehan.

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption. - 1 online resource (230 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Portland State University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Electric Vehicle (EV) has become an increasingly important topic in recent years due to energy and environmental concerns. Governments started to focus on remedies to the upcoming climate change threat and seek solutions through policies and regulations. The negative impact of carbon emissions along with pressure from governmental and social organizations force automotive manufacturers to shift to alternative energy sources. However, EV transition is a complex problem because its stakeholders are very diverse including governments, policy makers, EV manufacturers, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). Consequently, the barriers to EV adoption are not only consumer oriented, rather exist under many categories. The literature has yet to offer a comprehensive, quantified list of barriers to EV adoption. Although the enacted policies are known, the effectiveness of these policies in mitigating EV adoption is not known.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438140332Subjects--Topical Terms:

558618
Management.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.
LDR:03792ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 917893
005 20181022132249.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438140332
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10825203
035 $a (MiAaPQ)psu:12113
035 $a AAI10825203
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Yildiz, Bilgehan. $3 1192083
245 1 0 $a Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (230 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Dundar F. Kocaoglu.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Portland State University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Electric Vehicle (EV) has become an increasingly important topic in recent years due to energy and environmental concerns. Governments started to focus on remedies to the upcoming climate change threat and seek solutions through policies and regulations. The negative impact of carbon emissions along with pressure from governmental and social organizations force automotive manufacturers to shift to alternative energy sources. However, EV transition is a complex problem because its stakeholders are very diverse including governments, policy makers, EV manufacturers, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). Consequently, the barriers to EV adoption are not only consumer oriented, rather exist under many categories. The literature has yet to offer a comprehensive, quantified list of barriers to EV adoption. Although the enacted policies are known, the effectiveness of these policies in mitigating EV adoption is not known.
520 $a The objective of this research is to assess policy alternatives for mitigation of EV adoption barriers by developing a comprehensive evaluation model. Barriers are grouped under Social, Technical, Environmental, Economic and Political (STEEP) perspectives that are perceived by decision makers as important for adoption process. The decision model of research links the perspectives to barriers, and policy alternatives. The research implements the hierarchical decision model (HDM) to construct a generalized policy assessment framework.
520 $a Data for EV adoption barriers were collected from the abovementioned stakeholders.
520 $a Experts' qualitative judgments were collected and quantified using the pair-wise comparison method. The final rankings and effectiveness of policy alternatives were calculated. This research's results showed that the most important perspective is Economic. The top three most important barriers to EV adoption were identified as Initial Cost, Battery Cost, and Entrenched Technology Resistance, respectively. The most effective policy in mitigating EV adoption barriers is R&D Incentives. The research also extended the policy effectiveness research with Policy Effectiveness Curves by reaching out to additional experts. These curves helped determine the effectiveness of each of the 6 policies at different implementation levels. Based on these results, 25 scenarios were applied by combinations of policies at different implementation levels to investigate how the effectiveness of policies can change compared to today's conditions.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Management. $3 558618
650 4 $a Automotive engineering. $3 1104081
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 1148568
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0540
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Portland State University. $b Engineering and Technology Management. $3 1192084
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825203 $z click for full text (PQDT)