國立虎尾科技大學 |

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk./
作者:	Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (241 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08A(E).
標題:	Comparative literature. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369634730

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.
Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem.

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk. - 1 online resource (241 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines nationalism, secularism, and identity issues in the works of three controversial writers of the late 20th and early 21st centuries: Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk. Through a comparative analysis of the theory and literature on national, religious and secular belonging, this study aims to clarify the function of metafiction as a literary technique, the novel as a genre, literature as a medium that questions, shapes or endorses identities, and Comparative Literature as a discipline that creates a link between theory and literary works. This study challenges one-sided and uncritical accounts of nationalism, secularism, and identity. I argue that, in direct or indirect dialogue with theory, the novels of Roth, Rushdie, and Pamuk all question forms of exclusivism in national, religious, and secular forms of belonging. This is shown through their use of metafiction and other literary devices that serve to engage in self-reflexivity. The examination of this literary production leads me to make explicit ways in which the forms of the novel and literature not only help to question forms of exclusion, but also are instrumental in calling for new, alternative, and non-exclusivist forms, definitions and possibilities of co-existence.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369634730Subjects--Topical Terms:

835159
Comparative literature.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.
LDR:02644ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 918000
005 20181022132813.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369634730
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10584712
035 $a (MiAaPQ)rutgersnb:7842
035 $a AAI10584712
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Ulus, Huseyin Ekrem. $3 1192215
245 1 0 $a Nationalism, secularism, belonging, and identity in Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (241 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Nelson Maldonado-Torres.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines nationalism, secularism, and identity issues in the works of three controversial writers of the late 20th and early 21st centuries: Philip Roth, Salman Rushdie, and Orhan Pamuk. Through a comparative analysis of the theory and literature on national, religious and secular belonging, this study aims to clarify the function of metafiction as a literary technique, the novel as a genre, literature as a medium that questions, shapes or endorses identities, and Comparative Literature as a discipline that creates a link between theory and literary works. This study challenges one-sided and uncritical accounts of nationalism, secularism, and identity. I argue that, in direct or indirect dialogue with theory, the novels of Roth, Rushdie, and Pamuk all question forms of exclusivism in national, religious, and secular forms of belonging. This is shown through their use of metafiction and other literary devices that serve to engage in self-reflexivity. The examination of this literary production leads me to make explicit ways in which the forms of the novel and literature not only help to question forms of exclusion, but also are instrumental in calling for new, alternative, and non-exclusivist forms, definitions and possibilities of co-existence.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 835159
650 4 $a Middle Eastern literature. $3 1189490
650 4 $a Modern literature. $3 1148444
650 4 $a Asian literature. $3 1183555
650 4 $a American literature. $3 685398
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0295
690 $a 0315
690 $a 0298
690 $a 0305
690 $a 0591
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $b Graduate School - New Brunswick. $3 845606
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10584712 $z click for full text (PQDT)