國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Limits of Forgiveness and the Merits of Resentment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Limits of Forgiveness and the Merits of Resentment./
作者:	Ramacus-Bushnell, Desiree Gabrielle.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (117 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-12A(E).
標題:	Ethics. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355038729

The Limits of Forgiveness and the Merits of Resentment.
Ramacus-Bushnell, Desiree Gabrielle.

The Limits of Forgiveness and the Merits of Resentment. - 1 online resource (117 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Memphis, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The end of this dissertation is to demonstrate why, from a moral perspective, individual agents who have suffered from deep harm ought to be empowered to hold on to their resentment, and why they must not be encouraged, forced, or coerced into reconciliation with wrongdoers. This dissertation offers a moral defense of resentment. On the view that I defend, resentment has not only prudential value---this is already claimed elsewhere---but also, under certain conditions, resentment has a distinctive moral value. I argue that there are cases where resentment may be normatively required even when other "values" are within reach, such as forgiveness. This dissertation argues that morality sometimes requires that victims of wrongdoing be given the option to continue to resent wrongdoers, and that the grounds of this lies specifically in the agent's duty to resent.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355038729Subjects--Topical Terms:

555769
Ethics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Limits of Forgiveness and the Merits of Resentment.
LDR:02979ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 918029
005 20181022132813.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355038729
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10633183
035 $a AAI10633183
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Ramacus-Bushnell, Desiree Gabrielle. $3 1192254
245 1 4 $a The Limits of Forgiveness and the Merits of Resentment.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (117 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Remy Debes.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Memphis, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The end of this dissertation is to demonstrate why, from a moral perspective, individual agents who have suffered from deep harm ought to be empowered to hold on to their resentment, and why they must not be encouraged, forced, or coerced into reconciliation with wrongdoers. This dissertation offers a moral defense of resentment. On the view that I defend, resentment has not only prudential value---this is already claimed elsewhere---but also, under certain conditions, resentment has a distinctive moral value. I argue that there are cases where resentment may be normatively required even when other "values" are within reach, such as forgiveness. This dissertation argues that morality sometimes requires that victims of wrongdoing be given the option to continue to resent wrongdoers, and that the grounds of this lies specifically in the agent's duty to resent.
520 $a There are at least two major consequences of my view. First, my view both directly and indirectly challenges influential existing accounts of forgiveness in Anglo-American philosophy whose valuing of forgiveness in part turns on the devaluing of resentment. Thus, in Chapters 1 and 4, I answer deontological theories of forgiveness which suggest that there are always overriding moral reasons for agents to forgive. In Chapter 1, I answer virtue-based theories of forgiveness that emphasize the importance of an individual agent's striving to forgive whenever it is possible to do so. And in Chapter 3, I answer consequentialist theories of forgiveness that claim that forgiveness produces superior individual and social outcomes. The second upshot of this project is that it provides a starting point for defending resentment in social and political contexts, especially those dealing with issues of restorative justice.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Memphis. $3 1148557
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-12A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10633183 $z click for full text (PQDT)