國立虎尾科技大學 |

Politics after Totalitarianism : = Rethinking Evil, Action, and Judgment in Kant, Arendt, and Lyotard.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Politics after Totalitarianism :/
其他題名:	Rethinking Evil, Action, and Judgment in Kant, Arendt, and Lyotard.
作者:	Burdman, Javier Dario.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (220 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438115934

Politics after Totalitarianism : = Rethinking Evil, Action, and Judgment in Kant, Arendt, and Lyotard.
Burdman, Javier Dario.

Politics after Totalitarianism :Rethinking Evil, Action, and Judgment in Kant, Arendt, and Lyotard. - 1 online resource (220 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Hannah Arendt claimed that "totalitarianism" emerged as a new word to designate a new form of evil in politics. However, she added, the use of a new word does not imply that we understand what this novelty consists in. This dissertation is an attempt to understand the novelty of totalitarian evil. The central argument, following Arendt, is that this understanding requires a reconsideration of the notions of action and judgment. A further argument is that a radical reconsideration of action and judgment in response to a new form of evil in modernity takes place in Immanuel Kant's practical philosophy, which influenced the political thought of two prominent post-totalitarian thinkers: Arendt and Jean-Francois Lyotard. The first part of the dissertation analyzes the relationship between evil and action in Kant and Arendt. For both thinkers, evil consists in the destruction of responsibility for action, which stems from the capacity to begin, transform ourselves, and establish relationships with others. The second part analyzes the relationship between evil and judgment in Kant and Lyotard. In their view, evil corrupts the power of judgment by concealing its uncertainty under absolute rules that preclude disagreement. The conclusion argues that action and judgment imply the exposure and endurance of uncertainty, while evil stems from the attempt to eliminate uncertainty.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438115934Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Politics after Totalitarianism : = Rethinking Evil, Action, and Judgment in Kant, Arendt, and Lyotard.
LDR:02649ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 918079
005 20181022132814.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438115934
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10750580
035 $a (MiAaPQ)northwestern:14063
035 $a AAI10750580
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Burdman, Javier Dario. $3 1192309
245 1 0 $a Politics after Totalitarianism : $b Rethinking Evil, Action, and Judgment in Kant, Arendt, and Lyotard.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (220 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mary G. Dietz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Hannah Arendt claimed that "totalitarianism" emerged as a new word to designate a new form of evil in politics. However, she added, the use of a new word does not imply that we understand what this novelty consists in. This dissertation is an attempt to understand the novelty of totalitarian evil. The central argument, following Arendt, is that this understanding requires a reconsideration of the notions of action and judgment. A further argument is that a radical reconsideration of action and judgment in response to a new form of evil in modernity takes place in Immanuel Kant's practical philosophy, which influenced the political thought of two prominent post-totalitarian thinkers: Arendt and Jean-Francois Lyotard. The first part of the dissertation analyzes the relationship between evil and action in Kant and Arendt. For both thinkers, evil consists in the destruction of responsibility for action, which stems from the capacity to begin, transform ourselves, and establish relationships with others. The second part analyzes the relationship between evil and judgment in Kant and Lyotard. In their view, evil corrupts the power of judgment by concealing its uncertainty under absolute rules that preclude disagreement. The conclusion argues that action and judgment imply the exposure and endurance of uncertainty, while evil stems from the attempt to eliminate uncertainty.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Political Science. $3 1180890
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10750580 $z click for full text (PQDT)