國立虎尾科技大學 |

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice : = Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice :/
其他題名:	Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
作者:	Newton, Daniel.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (198 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355931747

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice : = Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
Newton, Daniel.

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice :Accounting for Voice Function and Scope. - 1 online resource (198 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Constructive voice, the sharing of ideas or concerns that improve organizational functioning, is an important workplace behavior. Recent narrative reviews of constructive voice have highlighted the importance of accounting for different types of voice. Initial efforts to explain the type of constructive voice have focused on voice function, and distinguished constructive voice as promotive or prohibitive in nature. Yet, research findings regarding relationships between promotive and prohibitive voice and antecedents of constructive voice reveal inconsistencies that suggest that our theoretical understanding is incomplete. In this dissertation, I argue that in addition to distinguishing constructive voice as to its function (i.e., promotive voice and prohibitive voice), it is also important to distinguish constructive voice as to its scope (i.e., the number of different issues expressed by employees). By accounting for the function and scope of voice, I develop four specific types of constructive voice (i.e., championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling) and conduct two studies wherein I establish construct validity and test differences in antecedent and outcome relationships with the specific types of voice. I first focus on scale development: generating items and assessing content validity. In Study 1, I test the factor structure of championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling, and the nomological network of the measures. My second study is a field study of 251 employees in an insurance company and manufacturing facility. In Study 2 I test the criterion-related validity of the measures and explore the implications of voice scope. The research reported in my dissertation contributes to our understanding of constructive voice, and following from this, facilitates further theoretical and practical advances as to when employees who voice may be heard and when they may be tuned out.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355931747Subjects--Topical Terms:

558618
Management.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice : = Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
LDR:03190ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 918243
005 20181022132748.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355931747
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10809268
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17847
035 $a AAI10809268
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Newton, Daniel. $3 1192515
245 1 0 $a Expanding our Understanding of Constructive Voice : $b Accounting for Voice Function and Scope.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (198 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jeffery A. LePine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Constructive voice, the sharing of ideas or concerns that improve organizational functioning, is an important workplace behavior. Recent narrative reviews of constructive voice have highlighted the importance of accounting for different types of voice. Initial efforts to explain the type of constructive voice have focused on voice function, and distinguished constructive voice as promotive or prohibitive in nature. Yet, research findings regarding relationships between promotive and prohibitive voice and antecedents of constructive voice reveal inconsistencies that suggest that our theoretical understanding is incomplete. In this dissertation, I argue that in addition to distinguishing constructive voice as to its function (i.e., promotive voice and prohibitive voice), it is also important to distinguish constructive voice as to its scope (i.e., the number of different issues expressed by employees). By accounting for the function and scope of voice, I develop four specific types of constructive voice (i.e., championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling) and conduct two studies wherein I establish construct validity and test differences in antecedent and outcome relationships with the specific types of voice. I first focus on scale development: generating items and assessing content validity. In Study 1, I test the factor structure of championing, initiating, alarming, and patrolling, and the nomological network of the measures. My second study is a field study of 251 employees in an insurance company and manufacturing facility. In Study 2 I test the criterion-related validity of the measures and explore the implications of voice scope. The research reported in my dissertation contributes to our understanding of constructive voice, and following from this, facilitates further theoretical and practical advances as to when employees who voice may be heard and when they may be tuned out.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Management. $3 558618
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 1179639
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0624
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Business Administration. $3 1179476
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809268 $z click for full text (PQDT)