國立虎尾科技大學 |

Overlooked : = Balancing Habitat and Access in Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Overlooked :/
其他題名:	Balancing Habitat and Access in Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends.
作者:	Boyd, Evan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (70 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-06(E).
標題:	Landscape architecture. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355124910

Overlooked : = Balancing Habitat and Access in Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends.
Boyd, Evan.

Overlooked :Balancing Habitat and Access in Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends. - 1 online resource (70 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

With rapidly increasing density, increasingly wealthier residents that prefer waterfront real estate and state laws allowing privatization of the shorelines, rights of way and water access are two critically important facets in the future of Seattle's public open space. The City of Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends Program holds 142 shorelines rights of way in perpetuity as public access points to Seattle's numerous bodies of water. With minimal funding for improvements and maintenance, the City relies on community members to maintain these sites once they've been improved. Improvements to vacant shoreline street ends must abide by the Shoreline Management Plan which requires native plantings and encourage salmon-friendly plantings. While this sounds nice, the reality is that many improved shoreline street ends appear overgrown, claustrophobic and unwelcoming to many, implying that public access and improved habitat have conflicting resting states; ie the lawn versus the thicket.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355124910Subjects--Topical Terms:

555495
Landscape architecture.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Overlooked : = Balancing Habitat and Access in Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends.
LDR:03734ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 918317
005 20181114145235.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355124910
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10599090
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:17567
035 $a AAI10599090
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Boyd, Evan. $3 1192608
245 1 0 $a Overlooked : $b Balancing Habitat and Access in Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (70 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
500 $a Adviser: Jeff Hou.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a With rapidly increasing density, increasingly wealthier residents that prefer waterfront real estate and state laws allowing privatization of the shorelines, rights of way and water access are two critically important facets in the future of Seattle's public open space. The City of Seattle's Shoreline Street Ends Program holds 142 shorelines rights of way in perpetuity as public access points to Seattle's numerous bodies of water. With minimal funding for improvements and maintenance, the City relies on community members to maintain these sites once they've been improved. Improvements to vacant shoreline street ends must abide by the Shoreline Management Plan which requires native plantings and encourage salmon-friendly plantings. While this sounds nice, the reality is that many improved shoreline street ends appear overgrown, claustrophobic and unwelcoming to many, implying that public access and improved habitat have conflicting resting states; ie the lawn versus the thicket.
520 $a A second conclusion is that stewards are not effectively engaging with their local street ends, which due to perceptions of danger in overgrown spaces, creates a self-perpetuating cycle of disinterest, plant growth and associations with crime. Then can future shoreline street end improvements more intentionally address each site's future maintenance through design, so that stewardship becomes more likely? Through analyzing three improved street ends, the results show designs that were well-considered but were altered at the last minute or over time, and lacking in documentation. In addition, plant placement, material choice, and maintenance decisions combined to create less than ideal conditions for stewards to engage with their sites. Guidelines culled from a literature review and the results of three case studies were applied to three unimproved street ends, in an attempt to test the flexibility of the guidelines and showcase the diversity in sites that program coordinators must contend with.
520 $a The results were three street end designs that interweave wildlife habitat and public access to the water while keeping separate enough so as to not negatively impact one another. Cumitively, this suggests that rights-of-way programs such as shoreline street ends, have potential to positively impact humans and wildlife populations however steps must be taken to reduce the maintenance burden on volunteer stewards. Without designing for these people, our underfunded public spaces will continue to deteriorate.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 555495
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0390
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Landscape Architecture. $3 1183420
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-06(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599090 $z click for full text (PQDT)