國立虎尾科技大學 |

An Evaluation of the Microsoft HoloLens for a Manufacturing-Guided Assembly Task.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Evaluation of the Microsoft HoloLens for a Manufacturing-Guided Assembly Task./
作者:	Hoover, Melynda.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (67 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-06(E).
標題:	Mechanical engineering. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438074101

An Evaluation of the Microsoft HoloLens for a Manufacturing-Guided Assembly Task.
Hoover, Melynda.

An Evaluation of the Microsoft HoloLens for a Manufacturing-Guided Assembly Task. - 1 online resource (67 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.

Thesis (M.S.)--Iowa State University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Many studies have confirmed the benefits of using Augmented Reality (AR) work instructions over traditional digital or paper instructions, but few have compared the effects of different AR hardware for complex assembly tasks. For this research, previously published data using Desktop Model Based Instructions (MBI), Tablet MBI, and Tablet AR instructions were compared to new assembly data collected using AR instructions on the Microsoft HoloLens Head Mounted Display (HMD). Participants completed a mock wing assembly task, and measures like completion time, error count, Net Promoter Score, and qualitative feedback were recorded. The HoloLens condition yielded faster completion times than all other conditions. HoloLens users also had lower error rates than those who used the non-AR conditions. Despite the performance benefits of the HoloLens AR instructions, users of this condition reported lower net promoter scores than users of the Tablet AR instructions. The qualitative data showed that some users thought the HoloLens device was uncomfortable and that the tracking was not always exact. Although the user feedback favored the Tablet AR condition, the HoloLens condition resulted in significantly faster assembly times. As a result, it is recommended to use the HoloLens for complex guided assembly instructions with minor changes, such as allowing the user to toggle the AR instructions on and off at will. The results of this paper can help manufacturing stakeholders better understand the benefits of different AR technology for manual assembly tasks.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438074101Subjects--Topical Terms:

557493
Mechanical engineering.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

An Evaluation of the Microsoft HoloLens for a Manufacturing-Guided Assembly Task.
LDR:02772ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 918387
005 20181114145236.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438074101
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10790066
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iastate:17285
035 $a AAI10790066
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hoover, Melynda. $3 1192700
245 1 3 $a An Evaluation of the Microsoft HoloLens for a Manufacturing-Guided Assembly Task.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (67 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-06.
500 $a Adviser: Eliot Winer.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Iowa State University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Many studies have confirmed the benefits of using Augmented Reality (AR) work instructions over traditional digital or paper instructions, but few have compared the effects of different AR hardware for complex assembly tasks. For this research, previously published data using Desktop Model Based Instructions (MBI), Tablet MBI, and Tablet AR instructions were compared to new assembly data collected using AR instructions on the Microsoft HoloLens Head Mounted Display (HMD). Participants completed a mock wing assembly task, and measures like completion time, error count, Net Promoter Score, and qualitative feedback were recorded. The HoloLens condition yielded faster completion times than all other conditions. HoloLens users also had lower error rates than those who used the non-AR conditions. Despite the performance benefits of the HoloLens AR instructions, users of this condition reported lower net promoter scores than users of the Tablet AR instructions. The qualitative data showed that some users thought the HoloLens device was uncomfortable and that the tracking was not always exact. Although the user feedback favored the Tablet AR condition, the HoloLens condition resulted in significantly faster assembly times. As a result, it is recommended to use the HoloLens for complex guided assembly instructions with minor changes, such as allowing the user to toggle the AR instructions on and off at will. The results of this paper can help manufacturing stakeholders better understand the benefits of different AR technology for manual assembly tasks.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Mechanical engineering. $3 557493
650 4 $a Industrial engineering. $3 679492
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0548
690 $a 0546
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Iowa State University. $b Mechanical Engineering. $3 845655
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-06(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10790066 $z click for full text (PQDT)