國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Domain-Specificity of Epistemological Understanding in Making Aesthetic Judgments.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Domain-Specificity of Epistemological Understanding in Making Aesthetic Judgments./
Author:	Crow, William B.
Description:	1 online resource (65 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-07B(E).
Subject:	Cognitive psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369569254

The Domain-Specificity of Epistemological Understanding in Making Aesthetic Judgments.
Crow, William B.

The Domain-Specificity of Epistemological Understanding in Making Aesthetic Judgments. - 1 online resource (65 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Literature in arts education suggests that experiences in the arts support the development of thinking skills such as critical thinking and reasoning (Fiske, 1999; Eisner, 2004; Greene, Kisida, and Bowen, 2014). But do individuals make aesthetic judgments supported by critical thinking and reasoning, or are these judgments based only on subjective preferences or personal taste? The present study examines whether undergraduate college students from an elite private university serving primarily students of high socioeconomic status (SES) and a public university serving primarily low SES students (n=150) invoke criteria when making evaluative judgments across the domains of visual art, music, and a non-aesthetic more general domain. Students were asked to compare two works of art (visual art or music), and to compare two fictional political candidates and to indicate whether one could be judged superior to the other and if so on what basis. Responses reflected levels of epistemological understanding---that is, whether judgments are based primarily on facts (Absolutist level), subjective opinions (Multiplist level), or criteria (Evaluativist level).

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369569254Subjects--Topical Terms:

556029
Cognitive psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Domain-Specificity of Epistemological Understanding in Making Aesthetic Judgments.
LDR:03534ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 918445
005 20181026115415.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369569254
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10255718
035 $a (MiAaPQ)columbia:13738
035 $a AAI10255718
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Crow, William B. $3 1192769
245 1 4 $a The Domain-Specificity of Epistemological Understanding in Making Aesthetic Judgments.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (65 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Deanna Kuhn.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Literature in arts education suggests that experiences in the arts support the development of thinking skills such as critical thinking and reasoning (Fiske, 1999; Eisner, 2004; Greene, Kisida, and Bowen, 2014). But do individuals make aesthetic judgments supported by critical thinking and reasoning, or are these judgments based only on subjective preferences or personal taste? The present study examines whether undergraduate college students from an elite private university serving primarily students of high socioeconomic status (SES) and a public university serving primarily low SES students (n=150) invoke criteria when making evaluative judgments across the domains of visual art, music, and a non-aesthetic more general domain. Students were asked to compare two works of art (visual art or music), and to compare two fictional political candidates and to indicate whether one could be judged superior to the other and if so on what basis. Responses reflected levels of epistemological understanding---that is, whether judgments are based primarily on facts (Absolutist level), subjective opinions (Multiplist level), or criteria (Evaluativist level).
520 $a The majority of participants displayed Multiplist levels in the aesthetic domains. Evaluativist levels were more common in the non-aesthetic domain, although significantly so only in comparison to the music domain among the students from the private elite university.
520 $a Group comparisons across the two aesthetic domains showed that individuals scored at the Evaluativist level with more frequency in the visual art domain as compared to the music domain. However, this difference was significant only among the participants from the private elite university and not among the participants from the public university. The general educational and social background of the participants (private elite university setting versus public university setting) proved to be the strongest predictor of Evaluativist-level responses.
520 $a Continued research in epistemological understanding in the aesthetic domain is needed, as development in epistemological thinking may afford insights into the degree to which individuals exercise critical thinking about the arts, and how such thinking can be fostered.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 4 $a Art education. $3 1179362
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0273
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Cognitive Studies in Education. $3 1188096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-07B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10255718 $z click for full text (PQDT)