國立虎尾科技大學 |

Crossing status divides : = Stereotypes, strategies, and solutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Crossing status divides :/
其他題名:	Stereotypes, strategies, and solutions.
作者:	Dupree, Cydney Hurston.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (179 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-11B(E).
標題:	Social psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355041415

Crossing status divides : = Stereotypes, strategies, and solutions.
Dupree, Cydney Hurston.

Crossing status divides :Stereotypes, strategies, and solutions. - 1 online resource (179 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The state of interracial relations in America remains a work in progress. This dissertation presents two related lines of work that examine intergroup divisions---one at the societal level, another at the interpersonal level. Both programs of research explore stereotypes surrounding members of advantaged and disadvantaged social groups---their content, the forms they can take, and their ultimate role in macro- and micro-level divisions. One such stereotype is associations between race and status that link Whites with high-status positions and Blacks with low-status positions. Chapter 1 introduces a novel measure of race-status associations (RSAs), testing its validity and exploring the consequences of holding RSAs for Whites' occupational preferences for self and others. Chapter 2 explores RSAs among minority participants, further determining how such stereotypes can limit---or promote---social mobility among minorities. The final two chapters extend this work by examining how stereotypes can impact divisions between groups on the interpersonal level, influencing self-presentation in same- versus other-group settings. Chapter 3 reports experimental and archival studies that find a subtle but reliable consequence of endorsing racial equality: patronizing minorities. White liberals presented less competence to minorities than to other Whites. This apparently unintentional but patronizing competence- downshift suggests that well-intentioned Whites draw on low-status/competence stereotypes to affiliate with minorities. Finally, Chapter 4 presents evidence that well-intentioned Blacks also draw on stereotypes when attempting to affiliate with outgroup members. Black conservatives adopted the opposite outgroup-focused affiliation strategy, reversing the stereotype applied to their ingroup by engaging in a competence upshift with a White (versus Black) interaction partner. Discussion considers applications in additional applied domains, implications for intergroup divisions, and directions for future research.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355041415Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Crossing status divides : = Stereotypes, strategies, and solutions.
LDR:03255ntm a2200325Ki 4500 001 918474
005 20181026115416.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355041415
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10284005
035 $a (MiAaPQ)princeton:12159
035 $a AAI10284005
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dupree, Cydney Hurston. $3 1192804
245 1 0 $a Crossing status divides : $b Stereotypes, strategies, and solutions.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (179 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Susan T. Fiske; Stacey Sinclair.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The state of interracial relations in America remains a work in progress. This dissertation presents two related lines of work that examine intergroup divisions---one at the societal level, another at the interpersonal level. Both programs of research explore stereotypes surrounding members of advantaged and disadvantaged social groups---their content, the forms they can take, and their ultimate role in macro- and micro-level divisions. One such stereotype is associations between race and status that link Whites with high-status positions and Blacks with low-status positions. Chapter 1 introduces a novel measure of race-status associations (RSAs), testing its validity and exploring the consequences of holding RSAs for Whites' occupational preferences for self and others. Chapter 2 explores RSAs among minority participants, further determining how such stereotypes can limit---or promote---social mobility among minorities. The final two chapters extend this work by examining how stereotypes can impact divisions between groups on the interpersonal level, influencing self-presentation in same- versus other-group settings. Chapter 3 reports experimental and archival studies that find a subtle but reliable consequence of endorsing racial equality: patronizing minorities. White liberals presented less competence to minorities than to other Whites. This apparently unintentional but patronizing competence- downshift suggests that well-intentioned Whites draw on low-status/competence stereotypes to affiliate with minorities. Finally, Chapter 4 presents evidence that well-intentioned Blacks also draw on stereotypes when attempting to affiliate with outgroup members. Black conservatives adopted the opposite outgroup-focused affiliation strategy, reversing the stereotype applied to their ingroup by engaging in a competence upshift with a White (versus Black) interaction partner. Discussion considers applications in additional applied domains, implications for intergroup divisions, and directions for future research.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Princeton University. $b Psychology. $3 1186553
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-11B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10284005 $z click for full text (PQDT)