語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Cognition does not affect perception.
~
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
Cognition does not affect perception.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Cognition does not affect perception./
作者:
Firestone, Chaz.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (115 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-11B(E).
標題:
Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355028508
Cognition does not affect perception.
Firestone, Chaz.
Cognition does not affect perception.
- 1 online resource (115 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2017.
Includes bibliographical references
There may be no more foundational distinction between types of processes in the mind than the distinction between seeing and thinking. How do perception and cognition interact? And how do they fail to interact? A tidal wave of recent research, spanning two decades and hundreds of papers, has alleged that higher-level cognitive states such as desires, emotions, intentions, and linguistic representations reach down into visual processing and literally change what we see. As a result, there is a growing consensus that such effects are ubiquitous, and that the distinction between seeing and thinking may itself be unsustainable. This dissertation argues otherwise: There is in fact no compelling evidence for such top-down effects of cognition on perception, or "cognitive penetrability". I report several case studies of empirically anchored `pitfalls' that recast such evidence, in each case showing how alleged top-down effects on perception not only can be explained by alternative factors, but in fact are explained by such factors. I also organize these pitfalls into a `checklist' that future work could use to convincingly demonstrate top-down effects on visual perception. Perception may interact with cognition in deep and interesting ways, but there are powerful constraints on the relationship between seeing and thinking imposed by fundamental principles of how the mind is organized.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355028508Subjects--Topical Terms:
556029
Cognitive psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Cognition does not affect perception.
LDR
:02526ntm a2200313Ki 4500
001
918510
005
20181026115417.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355028508
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10632601
035
$a
AAI10632601
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Firestone, Chaz.
$3
1192849
245
1 0
$a
Cognition does not affect perception.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (115 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Adviser: Brian J. Scholl.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
There may be no more foundational distinction between types of processes in the mind than the distinction between seeing and thinking. How do perception and cognition interact? And how do they fail to interact? A tidal wave of recent research, spanning two decades and hundreds of papers, has alleged that higher-level cognitive states such as desires, emotions, intentions, and linguistic representations reach down into visual processing and literally change what we see. As a result, there is a growing consensus that such effects are ubiquitous, and that the distinction between seeing and thinking may itself be unsustainable. This dissertation argues otherwise: There is in fact no compelling evidence for such top-down effects of cognition on perception, or "cognitive penetrability". I report several case studies of empirically anchored `pitfalls' that recast such evidence, in each case showing how alleged top-down effects on perception not only can be explained by alternative factors, but in fact are explained by such factors. I also organize these pitfalls into a `checklist' that future work could use to convincingly demonstrate top-down effects on visual perception. Perception may interact with cognition in deep and interesting ways, but there are powerful constraints on the relationship between seeing and thinking imposed by fundamental principles of how the mind is organized.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Cognitive psychology.
$3
556029
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0633
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Yale University.
$3
1178968
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-11B(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10632601
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入