語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of ...
~
Princeton University.
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Patch Foraging.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Patch Foraging./
作者:
Kane, Gary A.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (99 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-10B(E).
標題:
Neurosciences. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780438047761
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Patch Foraging.
Kane, Gary A.
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Patch Foraging.
- 1 online resource (99 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references
Serial stay-or-search decisions, in which one must choose to stick with a current resource or to search for a new, potentially better one, are ubiquitous across many domains. These decisions have been studied extensively in patch-foraging paradigms, in which animals, including humans, decide to stick with a depleting reward within a "patch," or to leave the current "patch" to search for a new one yielding greater rewards, but that comes at the cost of time and effort spent traveling to the new "patch." A variety of animals, ranging from invertebrates to birds to mammals, generally follow predictions of the optimal foraging theory, particularly the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT; Charnov, 1976), but animals have the tendency to overharvest, or stick with the depleting reward longer than is predicted by MVT. Common biases in intertemporal choice, such as decreasing marginal utility for larger rewards or discounting of future reward, have been hypothesized as the cause of overharvesting, but there have been few direct tests of whether these biases influence foraging behavior. From a neural perspective, multiple brain regions that contribute to stay-or-search decisions have been identified, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which is hypothesized to monitor the difficulty in deciding to stay vs. search, and the locus coeruleus (LC), which is hypothesized to regulate the decision process. This thesis extends knowledge of the behavioral and neural mechanisms of stay-or-search decisions. In Chapter 2, I describe a novel, operant chamber based patch foraging for rats. Similar to other animals, rats follow qualitative predictions of MVT: they stay longer in patches that yield greater rewards, and longer in all patches when the cost of traveling to a new patch is greater, but overharvest, staying patches longer than is predicted by MVT. In Chapter 3, I thoroughly characterized rat foraging behavior across a series of experiments: these revealed that in the context of foraging, rats exhibit time preferences similar to delay discounting paradigms, and that suboptimal decision making in foraging and delay discounting tasks is best explained by hyperbolic discounting. In Chapter 4, I begin to examine the neural mechanism of foraging decisions, investigating the role of the LC. Stimulation of LC-NE neurons impaired rats ability to focus on salient information in the task and impaired their ability to perform the task in general. In Chapter 5, I examine the function of the anterior cingulate. Rat ACC neurons increased in activity as rewards in a patch depleted and animals were more likely to leave patches. However, manipulation of ACC activity revealed that ACC was neither necessary for adaptive foraging decisions nor sufficient to drive decisions to leave patches. Altogether, these studies contribute to our knowledge of how animals make foraging decisions from a behavioral and neural perspective.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780438047761Subjects--Topical Terms:
593561
Neurosciences.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Patch Foraging.
LDR
:04190ntm a2200349Ki 4500
001
918584
005
20181026115418.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780438047761
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10814299
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)princeton:12515
035
$a
AAI10814299
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Kane, Gary A.
$3
1192941
245
1 0
$a
Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Patch Foraging.
264
0
$c
2018
300
$a
1 online resource (99 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Advisers: Jonathan D. Cohen; Gary Aston-Jones.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2018.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Serial stay-or-search decisions, in which one must choose to stick with a current resource or to search for a new, potentially better one, are ubiquitous across many domains. These decisions have been studied extensively in patch-foraging paradigms, in which animals, including humans, decide to stick with a depleting reward within a "patch," or to leave the current "patch" to search for a new one yielding greater rewards, but that comes at the cost of time and effort spent traveling to the new "patch." A variety of animals, ranging from invertebrates to birds to mammals, generally follow predictions of the optimal foraging theory, particularly the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT; Charnov, 1976), but animals have the tendency to overharvest, or stick with the depleting reward longer than is predicted by MVT. Common biases in intertemporal choice, such as decreasing marginal utility for larger rewards or discounting of future reward, have been hypothesized as the cause of overharvesting, but there have been few direct tests of whether these biases influence foraging behavior. From a neural perspective, multiple brain regions that contribute to stay-or-search decisions have been identified, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which is hypothesized to monitor the difficulty in deciding to stay vs. search, and the locus coeruleus (LC), which is hypothesized to regulate the decision process. This thesis extends knowledge of the behavioral and neural mechanisms of stay-or-search decisions. In Chapter 2, I describe a novel, operant chamber based patch foraging for rats. Similar to other animals, rats follow qualitative predictions of MVT: they stay longer in patches that yield greater rewards, and longer in all patches when the cost of traveling to a new patch is greater, but overharvest, staying patches longer than is predicted by MVT. In Chapter 3, I thoroughly characterized rat foraging behavior across a series of experiments: these revealed that in the context of foraging, rats exhibit time preferences similar to delay discounting paradigms, and that suboptimal decision making in foraging and delay discounting tasks is best explained by hyperbolic discounting. In Chapter 4, I begin to examine the neural mechanism of foraging decisions, investigating the role of the LC. Stimulation of LC-NE neurons impaired rats ability to focus on salient information in the task and impaired their ability to perform the task in general. In Chapter 5, I examine the function of the anterior cingulate. Rat ACC neurons increased in activity as rewards in a patch depleted and animals were more likely to leave patches. However, manipulation of ACC activity revealed that ACC was neither necessary for adaptive foraging decisions nor sufficient to drive decisions to leave patches. Altogether, these studies contribute to our knowledge of how animals make foraging decisions from a behavioral and neural perspective.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Neurosciences.
$3
593561
650
4
$a
Cognitive psychology.
$3
556029
650
4
$a
Psychology.
$3
555998
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0317
690
$a
0633
690
$a
0621
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Princeton University.
$b
Psychology.
$3
1186553
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-10B(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10814299
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入