國立虎尾科技大學 |

How Do Gestures Reflect Thought and When Do They Affect Thought?

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Do Gestures Reflect Thought and When Do They Affect Thought?/
作者:	Zrada, Melissa Bradley.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (118 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11B(E).
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438117570

How Do Gestures Reflect Thought and When Do They Affect Thought?
Zrada, Melissa Bradley.

How Do Gestures Reflect Thought and When Do They Affect Thought? - 1 online resource (118 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

People perform gestures both while communicating with others and while thinking to themselves. Gestures that people perform for themselves when they are alone can reveal a great deal about what they are thinking, and are also believed to improve comprehension and memory. Previous research has demonstrated that people gesture when information can be mapped directly to a spatial representation; for example, on tests of spatial thinking. What is not as widely researched is whether or not people will gesture for information that is not inherently spatial. Further, will people gesture for information that is not spatial or relational? And if individuals do gesture for these other types of stimuli, what types of gestures will they perform, and will gesturing improve memory?

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438117570Subjects--Topical Terms:

556029
Cognitive psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

How Do Gestures Reflect Thought and When Do They Affect Thought?
LDR:02818ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 918591
005 20181026115419.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438117570
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10829272
035 $a (MiAaPQ)columbia:14779
035 $a AAI10829272
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Zrada, Melissa Bradley. $3 1192949
245 1 0 $a How Do Gestures Reflect Thought and When Do They Affect Thought?
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (118 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Barbara Tversky.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a People perform gestures both while communicating with others and while thinking to themselves. Gestures that people perform for themselves when they are alone can reveal a great deal about what they are thinking, and are also believed to improve comprehension and memory. Previous research has demonstrated that people gesture when information can be mapped directly to a spatial representation; for example, on tests of spatial thinking. What is not as widely researched is whether or not people will gesture for information that is not inherently spatial. Further, will people gesture for information that is not spatial or relational? And if individuals do gesture for these other types of stimuli, what types of gestures will they perform, and will gesturing improve memory?
520 $a This work provides evidence that people do gesture, even when the information is not inherently spatial or relational. For information that is not spatial but related, people perform representational gestures; for example, creating an ordered list with their hands to represent preference of movie genres. For information that is non-relational, people use considerably fewer representational gestures, but can be observed using beat gestures, which are believed to help in keeping track of information. These studies did not provide strong evidence to support the claim that gestures help people understand and remember information, as gesture was only beneficial for one type of stimuli (mechanical systems). However, future research with more sensitive measures has the potential reveal this phenomenon.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Cognitive Studies in Education. $3 1188096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10829272 $z click for full text (PQDT)