國立虎尾科技大學 |

Authenticity and inauthenticity in Martin Heidegger's philosophy of history.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Authenticity and inauthenticity in Martin Heidegger's philosophy of history./
作者:	Little, Nolan Davis.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (276 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-07A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369654615

Authenticity and inauthenticity in Martin Heidegger's philosophy of history.
Little, Nolan Davis.

Authenticity and inauthenticity in Martin Heidegger's philosophy of history. - 1 online resource (276 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation explores the philosophy of history that Heidegger presents in his early magnum opus, Being and Time. I argue that his philosophy of history differs importantly from several influential philosophical studies of history by his predecessors (particularly Heinrich Rickert and Edmund Husserl), and that it makes a valuable contribution to subsequent philosophy of history. Heidegger's existential analysis emphasizes the interpretive character of the individual's relation to history and, as a consequence, the hermeneutical features of any philosophical approach to history. An essential part of his analysis is his insistence on the individual's frequently shirked responsibility for her interpretations. I argue that this focus on personal responsibility for historical interpretation places a burden upon the individual but also opens a possibility for creative engagement with the world. The value of the future is opened through the individual's responsible engagement with her history.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369654615Subjects--Topical Terms:

559771
Philosophy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Authenticity and inauthenticity in Martin Heidegger's philosophy of history.
LDR:03432ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 918613
005 20181030085010.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369654615
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10241191
035 $a (MiAaPQ)bu:12529
035 $a AAI10241191
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Little, Nolan Davis. $3 1192974
245 1 0 $a Authenticity and inauthenticity in Martin Heidegger's philosophy of history.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (276 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel Dahlstrom.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation explores the philosophy of history that Heidegger presents in his early magnum opus, Being and Time. I argue that his philosophy of history differs importantly from several influential philosophical studies of history by his predecessors (particularly Heinrich Rickert and Edmund Husserl), and that it makes a valuable contribution to subsequent philosophy of history. Heidegger's existential analysis emphasizes the interpretive character of the individual's relation to history and, as a consequence, the hermeneutical features of any philosophical approach to history. An essential part of his analysis is his insistence on the individual's frequently shirked responsibility for her interpretations. I argue that this focus on personal responsibility for historical interpretation places a burden upon the individual but also opens a possibility for creative engagement with the world. The value of the future is opened through the individual's responsible engagement with her history.
520 $a In the first the two chapters I introduce general sorts of problems that have beset the philosophy of history in the last two centuries, in particular, the problems presented by the prospect of an objective interpretation of history. Since the objectivity of an interpretation implies that the interpretation has some authority over those who understand it, I contend that the prospect of objective historical interpretation raises specific and daunting questions about one's responsibility with regard to such interpretations.
520 $a I continue the theme of responsibility and authority in the latter two chapters. There, I am interested in dissuading the reader from the view that Heidegger adopts an irresponsible attitude toward historical interpretation in Being and Time. By way of presenting a defense of Heidegger's analysis of authenticity and inauthenticity, I argue that his philosophy amounts to a robust defense of historical responsibility. Through his analysis of conscience, guilt and resoluteness, Heidegger demonstrates Dasein's capacity to recognize itself as a kind of entity that can and, indeed, must take responsibility for its interpretations and thereby for its historicity.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Boston University. $b Philosophy GRS. $3 1192975
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-07A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10241191 $z click for full text (PQDT)