國立虎尾科技大學 |

Unmitigated Skepticism : = The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Unmitigated Skepticism :/
其他題名:	The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism.
作者:	Wong, Andrew David.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (177 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369685602

Unmitigated Skepticism : = The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism.
Wong, Andrew David.

Unmitigated Skepticism :The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism. - 1 online resource (177 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The "scope" of Pyrrhonian Skepticism refers to the extent to which Skeptics bear epistemic commitments. There are two respects in which the debate between unmitigated and mitigated interpretations of Skepticism is significant. First, there is the philosophical question of which version of Pyrrhonism is more coherent and compelling when considered on its own merits. Second, there is the historical question of which sort of interpretation accurately characterizes Pyrrhonism itself, as it is presented in the works of Sextus Empiricus.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369685602Subjects--Topical Terms:

559771
Philosophy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Unmitigated Skepticism : = The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism.
LDR:03458ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 918617
005 20181030085011.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369685602
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10257958
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucsd:16274
035 $a AAI10257958
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Wong, Andrew David. $3 1192980
245 1 0 $a Unmitigated Skepticism : $b The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (177 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Monte R. Johnson; Casey Perin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Diego, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The "scope" of Pyrrhonian Skepticism refers to the extent to which Skeptics bear epistemic commitments. There are two respects in which the debate between unmitigated and mitigated interpretations of Skepticism is significant. First, there is the philosophical question of which version of Pyrrhonism is more coherent and compelling when considered on its own merits. Second, there is the historical question of which sort of interpretation accurately characterizes Pyrrhonism itself, as it is presented in the works of Sextus Empiricus.
520 $a My own arguments proceed accordingly. On the philosophical front, I argue (primarily in Chapters 2 and 3) that when the force of the Skeptical modes is fully understood, they are unmitigated in scope. On the historical side, I argue (primarily in Chapters 1 and 4) that an unmitigated interpretation of Pyrrhonism is consistent with the Sextan corpus. Throughout, my ultimate aim is to present a vision of unmitigated skepticism that is, if not an expression of the historical reality of Pyrrhonism, at least a direct descendant of it.
520 $a The central argument concerns the Five Modes of Agrippa, which are widely regarded as comprising the most powerful argument of Pyrrhonian Skepticism: the "Pyrrhonian Problematic." The intuitive force of the Problematic lies in its generality. It threatens to cast into doubt every claim that can be advanced on every subject. According to the standard interpretation, the Problematic achieves this by constituting a declarative argument that consists of appealing premises and the conclusion that epistemic justification is impossible.
520 $a I argue that this interpretation fails to capture the intuitive force of the Problematic in two ways: First, it is a mistake to interpret the scope of the Problematic as being narrowly restricted to the concept of epistemic justification. Second, and more importantly, it is a mistake to assume that the Problematic is an argument in the first place. Understanding its full potential requires that we instead interpret the Problematic procedurally, as a set of instructions that the Skeptic implements in engaging dialectically with an interlocutor's claims.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 671538
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $b Philosophy. $3 1186737
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10257958 $z click for full text (PQDT)