國立虎尾科技大學 |

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health./
作者:	Hocevar, Kristin Page.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (193 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-12A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355271348

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.
Hocevar, Kristin Page.

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health. - 1 online resource (193 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Health information is increasingly being shared online not just by credentialed sources such as physicians or health organizations, but also by patients with personal experience with a health concern. This dissertation proposes a new measure of vigilance-avoidance, or tendency to approach or avoid threatening stimuli, in order to understand how individual differences in this personality characteristic might influence selection and processing of online information about health. Two online experiments focusing on the topic of breast cancer were conducted to explore how individual levels of vigilance-avoidance moderate the effects of health message threat, community endorsement (e.g., online recommendations), and source type (patient- or physician-generated information) on selective exposure, perceptions of credibility, and helpfulness ratings. Results of these studies indicate that vigilance-avoidance interacts with these source, message, and community characteristics to influence both online health information selection behaviors and evaluations of online health information.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355271348Subjects--Topical Terms:

556422
Communication.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.
LDR:03439ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 918803
005 20181106104111.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355271348
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10599924
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucsb:13463
035 $a AAI10599924
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hocevar, Kristin Page. $3 1193225
245 1 0 $a Help or Hurt? Why We Select and How We Process Online Social Information About Health.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (193 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew J. Flanagin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Barbara, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Health information is increasingly being shared online not just by credentialed sources such as physicians or health organizations, but also by patients with personal experience with a health concern. This dissertation proposes a new measure of vigilance-avoidance, or tendency to approach or avoid threatening stimuli, in order to understand how individual differences in this personality characteristic might influence selection and processing of online information about health. Two online experiments focusing on the topic of breast cancer were conducted to explore how individual levels of vigilance-avoidance moderate the effects of health message threat, community endorsement (e.g., online recommendations), and source type (patient- or physician-generated information) on selective exposure, perceptions of credibility, and helpfulness ratings. Results of these studies indicate that vigilance-avoidance interacts with these source, message, and community characteristics to influence both online health information selection behaviors and evaluations of online health information.
520 $a Women who are more vigilant spend more time reading threatening health information and evaluate it as more credible than women who are more avoidant, suggesting that they may be more likely to find health information more credible simply because it is negative. Additionally, women who are more avoidant spend more time reading low threat information than high threat information. Women who are more avoidant also spend even less time looking at credible health information from a physician than they do information from a patient, suggesting that when allowed to selectively expose themselves to information, they may miss key messages from credentialed medical sources that are important to their overall health. Overall, results from these studies suggest that our tendency to approach or avoid health information, as well as our potential to trust and find it credible, are dependent on these key personality characteristics---a novel contribution in the areas of health, selective exposure, and information evaluation research.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 4 $a Health education. $3 585977
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 1148502
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0680
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Barbara. $b Communication. $3 1193226
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-12A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599924 $z click for full text (PQDT)