國立虎尾科技大學 |

Public Perceptions of Partisan Selective Exposure.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Public Perceptions of Partisan Selective Exposure./
作者:	Perryman, Mallory R.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (124 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:	Journalism. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355146936

Public Perceptions of Partisan Selective Exposure.
Perryman, Mallory R.

Public Perceptions of Partisan Selective Exposure. - 1 online resource (124 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Where do citizens believe others turn to for news? This dissertation introduces the idea of perceived partisan selective exposure: the perception that others curate media diets featuring primarily like-minded political content. Two studies examine citizens' estimates of others' news habits and provide insight into why individuals might assume others are drawn to ideologically consonant information. In Study 1, a national survey of voters (N= 657) before the 2016 presidential election gauged (a) how opposing partisans judged the political slant of various news sources and (b) how much election news partisans believe their opponents received from those sources. Results demonstrate that voters sense that their political opponents gravitated toward like-minded sources for election news. Respondents reported that the news the "other side" consumed failed to open them up to new ideas, made them more extreme, and reinforced their prior beliefs. In Study 2, a national survey of voters (N=815) reveals that while both Democrats and Republicans describe their own news diets as balanced between attitude-confirming and attitude-challenging news, they also believe that others, especially their political rivals, consume primarily like-minded content.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355146936Subjects--Topical Terms:

659797
Journalism.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Public Perceptions of Partisan Selective Exposure.
LDR:02808ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 918812
005 20181106104111.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355146936
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10607943
035 $a (MiAaPQ)wisc:14696
035 $a AAI10607943
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Perryman, Mallory R. $3 1193238
245 1 0 $a Public Perceptions of Partisan Selective Exposure.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (124 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Albert C. Gunther; Michael Wagner.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Where do citizens believe others turn to for news? This dissertation introduces the idea of perceived partisan selective exposure: the perception that others curate media diets featuring primarily like-minded political content. Two studies examine citizens' estimates of others' news habits and provide insight into why individuals might assume others are drawn to ideologically consonant information. In Study 1, a national survey of voters (N= 657) before the 2016 presidential election gauged (a) how opposing partisans judged the political slant of various news sources and (b) how much election news partisans believe their opponents received from those sources. Results demonstrate that voters sense that their political opponents gravitated toward like-minded sources for election news. Respondents reported that the news the "other side" consumed failed to open them up to new ideas, made them more extreme, and reinforced their prior beliefs. In Study 2, a national survey of voters (N=815) reveals that while both Democrats and Republicans describe their own news diets as balanced between attitude-confirming and attitude-challenging news, they also believe that others, especially their political rivals, consume primarily like-minded content.
520 $a These findings are then integrated into a broader model of perceived news media effects. People believe media have powerful effects on others. The present studies reveal that citizens believe their political opponents are voluntarily exposing themselves to the very media that is most likely to cause undesirable effects.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 659797
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0391
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Mass Communications - LS. $3 1179309
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607943 $z click for full text (PQDT)