國立虎尾科技大學 |

A World of Our Own : = Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A World of Our Own :/
其他題名:	Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
作者:	Howard-Williams, Rowan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (293 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355618778

A World of Our Own : = Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
Howard-Williams, Rowan.

A World of Our Own :Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene. - 1 online resource (293 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The effects of human impacts on the environment are often not comprehensible to people and have to be given meaning through communication. Such impacts, most prominently climate change, have increased to the extent that human actions are the dominant force in planetary biophysical systems. Yet these impacts are for the most part unintentional and not subject to democratic control. A critical discourse analysis of campaign material and media content examines how three advocacy groups -- 350, a climate activist organization, The Breakthrough Institute, a think-tank, and The Nature Conservancy, an established conservation organization -- discursively construct climate change. The three groups acknowledge the need to more consciously or deliberatively manage environmental impacts, and yet all have very different assumptions, objectives and tactics in their advocacy. Analysis of the communication activities of the organizations and how their ideas are represented and contested in other media shows not only how they construct the particular issue of climate change but their relationship to societal power relationships. How the organizations build their case for action involves discursive acts which define or re-define the boundaries between nature and society and what (and who) is to be included or excluded from political concern. Unless directly challenged, these new formations will reproduce existing power structures and inequalities.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355618778Subjects--Topical Terms:

556422
Communication.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A World of Our Own : = Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
LDR:02703ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 918834
005 20181106104112.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355618778
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10638173
035 $a (MiAaPQ)upenngdas:13032
035 $a AAI10638173
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Howard-Williams, Rowan. $3 1193265
245 1 2 $a A World of Our Own : $b Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (293 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Marwan M. Kraidy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The effects of human impacts on the environment are often not comprehensible to people and have to be given meaning through communication. Such impacts, most prominently climate change, have increased to the extent that human actions are the dominant force in planetary biophysical systems. Yet these impacts are for the most part unintentional and not subject to democratic control. A critical discourse analysis of campaign material and media content examines how three advocacy groups -- 350, a climate activist organization, The Breakthrough Institute, a think-tank, and The Nature Conservancy, an established conservation organization -- discursively construct climate change. The three groups acknowledge the need to more consciously or deliberatively manage environmental impacts, and yet all have very different assumptions, objectives and tactics in their advocacy. Analysis of the communication activities of the organizations and how their ideas are represented and contested in other media shows not only how they construct the particular issue of climate change but their relationship to societal power relationships. How the organizations build their case for action involves discursive acts which define or re-define the boundaries between nature and society and what (and who) is to be included or excluded from political concern. Unless directly challenged, these new formations will reproduce existing power structures and inequalities.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 1009004
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 1180247
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0477
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Communication. $3 1192772
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10638173 $z click for full text (PQDT)