國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Effects of Meaning Dominance and Meaning Relatedness on Ambiguity Resolution : = Idioms and Ambiguous Words.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Meaning Dominance and Meaning Relatedness on Ambiguity Resolution :/
其他題名:	Idioms and Ambiguous Words.
作者:	Milburn, Evelyn Arko.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (155 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09B(E).
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355887129

The Effects of Meaning Dominance and Meaning Relatedness on Ambiguity Resolution : = Idioms and Ambiguous Words.
Milburn, Evelyn Arko.

The Effects of Meaning Dominance and Meaning Relatedness on Ambiguity Resolution :Idioms and Ambiguous Words. - 1 online resource (155 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Figurative language is language in which combining the meanings of the individual words in an expression leads to a different meaning than the speaker intends (Glucksberg, 1991), resulting in potential ambiguity between meanings. In this dissertation, we tested the predictions of a sentence processing framework in which literal and figurative language are not truly distinct. To do this, we examined the effects of two constructs---meaning dominance and meaning relatedness---on comprehension of idioms and ambiguous words. Processing similarities between these two types of ambiguous unit would indicate that ambiguities are resolved using the same processes during language comprehension, and therefore that literal and figurative language are broadly similar rather than being categorically distinct. In two parallel sub-experiments, Experiment 1 compared facilitation for dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous units in a primed lexical decision task. For ambiguous words, participants showed greater facilitation when one meaning was strongly dominant. For idioms, participants showed greater facilitation for idioms compared to control phrases, and lowest accuracy when responding to literal target words following highly figuratively-dominant idioms. Experiment 2 used eyetracking during reading to examine how biasing context affected idiom meaning activation, as well as how idiom meanings were integrated into a larger text. Participants read the idioms slowest when both figurative dominance and meaning relatedness were high, and fastest when meaning relatedness was high and figurative dominance was low, replicating results for ambiguous word reading found by Foraker and Murphy (2012). This is suggestive evidence for a language comprehension system that resolves ambiguities similarly regardless of grain size or literality. We also found facilitative effects of meaning relatedness in idiom reading parallel to the polysemy advantage in ambiguous word research, providing evidence that meaning relatedness is universal to many types of ambiguity resolution. The present study provides preliminary evidence that idioms and ambiguous words are treated similarly during ambiguity resolution. These results have implications for our understanding of idiom comprehension, and suggest valuable new avenues for future research.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355887129Subjects--Topical Terms:

555998
Psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Effects of Meaning Dominance and Meaning Relatedness on Ambiguity Resolution : = Idioms and Ambiguous Words.
LDR:03535ntm a2200313Ki 4500 001 919381
005 20181127124955.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355887129
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10831875
035 $a AAI10831875
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Milburn, Evelyn Arko. $3 1193942
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Meaning Dominance and Meaning Relatedness on Ambiguity Resolution : $b Idioms and Ambiguous Words.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (155 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: B.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Figurative language is language in which combining the meanings of the individual words in an expression leads to a different meaning than the speaker intends (Glucksberg, 1991), resulting in potential ambiguity between meanings. In this dissertation, we tested the predictions of a sentence processing framework in which literal and figurative language are not truly distinct. To do this, we examined the effects of two constructs---meaning dominance and meaning relatedness---on comprehension of idioms and ambiguous words. Processing similarities between these two types of ambiguous unit would indicate that ambiguities are resolved using the same processes during language comprehension, and therefore that literal and figurative language are broadly similar rather than being categorically distinct. In two parallel sub-experiments, Experiment 1 compared facilitation for dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous units in a primed lexical decision task. For ambiguous words, participants showed greater facilitation when one meaning was strongly dominant. For idioms, participants showed greater facilitation for idioms compared to control phrases, and lowest accuracy when responding to literal target words following highly figuratively-dominant idioms. Experiment 2 used eyetracking during reading to examine how biasing context affected idiom meaning activation, as well as how idiom meanings were integrated into a larger text. Participants read the idioms slowest when both figurative dominance and meaning relatedness were high, and fastest when meaning relatedness was high and figurative dominance was low, replicating results for ambiguous word reading found by Foraker and Murphy (2012). This is suggestive evidence for a language comprehension system that resolves ambiguities similarly regardless of grain size or literality. We also found facilitative effects of meaning relatedness in idiom reading parallel to the polysemy advantage in ambiguous word research, providing evidence that meaning relatedness is universal to many types of ambiguity resolution. The present study provides preliminary evidence that idioms and ambiguous words are treated similarly during ambiguity resolution. These results have implications for our understanding of idiom comprehension, and suggest valuable new avenues for future research.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $b Psychology. $3 1193943
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10831875 $z click for full text (PQDT)