國立虎尾科技大學 |

Redistribution and Deliberation in Mandated Participatory Governance : = The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Redistribution and Deliberation in Mandated Participatory Governance :/
其他題名:	The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea.
作者:	No, Won.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (150 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Public administration. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355909777

Redistribution and Deliberation in Mandated Participatory Governance : = The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea.
No, Won.

Redistribution and Deliberation in Mandated Participatory Governance :The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea. - 1 online resource (150 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines whether participatory budgeting (PB) processes, as a case of participatory governance and an innovative approach to local governance, promote inclusive and deliberative government decision-making and social justice outcomes. The first chapter introduces the case of the dissertation, PB in the city of Seoul, South Korea. It reviews the history of PB and the literature on PB in South Korea and discusses three issues that arise when implementing legally mandated PB. The second chapter explores whether inclusive PB processes redistribute financial resources even without the presence of explicit equity criteria, using the last four years of PB resource allocation data and employing multi-level statistical analysis. The findings show that having a more inclusive process to encourage citizen participation helps poorer districts to win more resources than wealthier ones. The third chapter is a follow-up exploratory study; the possible reasons behind the redistributive effects of PB are discussed using interview data with PB participants. The findings suggest that the PB process could have been redistributive because it provided an opportunity for the people living in the comparatively poorer neighborhoods to participate in the government decision-making process. Additionally, when scoring proposals, participants valued 'needs' and 'urgency' as the most important criteria. The last chapter examines the 32 PB meetings in order to find the combinations of conditions that lead to a deliberative participatory process, employing qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). This dissertation contributes to the field of public management, and particularly participatory governance by providing a review of the literature on PB in South Korea, presenting empirical evidence on the redistributive effect of PB without explicit equity criteria, and finding the combinations of meeting conditions that could be used to promote deliberation in the context of PB.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355909777Subjects--Topical Terms:

562473
Public administration.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Redistribution and Deliberation in Mandated Participatory Governance : = The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea.
LDR:03278ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 920201
005 20181129120004.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355909777
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10810701
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17954
035 $a AAI10810701
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a No, Won. $3 1194935
245 1 0 $a Redistribution and Deliberation in Mandated Participatory Governance : $b The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (150 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Daniel Schugurensky.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines whether participatory budgeting (PB) processes, as a case of participatory governance and an innovative approach to local governance, promote inclusive and deliberative government decision-making and social justice outcomes. The first chapter introduces the case of the dissertation, PB in the city of Seoul, South Korea. It reviews the history of PB and the literature on PB in South Korea and discusses three issues that arise when implementing legally mandated PB. The second chapter explores whether inclusive PB processes redistribute financial resources even without the presence of explicit equity criteria, using the last four years of PB resource allocation data and employing multi-level statistical analysis. The findings show that having a more inclusive process to encourage citizen participation helps poorer districts to win more resources than wealthier ones. The third chapter is a follow-up exploratory study; the possible reasons behind the redistributive effects of PB are discussed using interview data with PB participants. The findings suggest that the PB process could have been redistributive because it provided an opportunity for the people living in the comparatively poorer neighborhoods to participate in the government decision-making process. Additionally, when scoring proposals, participants valued 'needs' and 'urgency' as the most important criteria. The last chapter examines the 32 PB meetings in order to find the combinations of conditions that lead to a deliberative participatory process, employing qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). This dissertation contributes to the field of public management, and particularly participatory governance by providing a review of the literature on PB in South Korea, presenting empirical evidence on the redistributive effect of PB without explicit equity criteria, and finding the combinations of meeting conditions that could be used to promote deliberation in the context of PB.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 562473
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1179577
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0342
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Public Administration and Policy. $3 1192486
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10810701 $z click for full text (PQDT)