國立虎尾科技大學 |

Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique in a Chemistry Classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique in a Chemistry Classroom./
作者:	Taylor, Kate R.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (60 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-05(E).
標題:	Chemistry. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369865981

Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique in a Chemistry Classroom.
Taylor, Kate R.

Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique in a Chemistry Classroom. - 1 online resource (60 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--Southern Connecticut State University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique, or IFAT, is a new testing system that turns a student's traditional multiple-choice testing into a chance for hands-on learning; and provides teachers with an opportunity to obtain more information about a student's knowledge during testing. In the current study we wanted to know if: When students are given the second-chance afforded by the IFAT system, are they guessing or using prior knowledge when making their second chance choice. Additionally, while there has been some adaptation of this testing system in non-science disciplines, we wanted to study if the IFAT-system would be well- received among faculty in the sciences, more specifically chemistry faculty. By comparing the students rate of success on second-chance afforded by the IFAT-system versus the statistical likelihood of guessing correctly, statistical analysis was used to determine if we observed enough students earning the second-chance points to reject the likelihood that students were randomly guessing. Our data analysis revealed that is statistically highly unlikely that students were only guessing when the IFAT system was utilized. (It is important to note that while we can find that students are getting the answer correct at a much higher rate than random guessing we can never truly know if every student is using thought or not.).

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369865981Subjects--Topical Terms:

593913
Chemistry.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique in a Chemistry Classroom.
LDR:02597ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 920292
005 20181130083525.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369865981
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10282632
035 $a (MiAaPQ)southernct:10241
035 $a AAI10282632
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Taylor, Kate R. $3 1195041
245 1 0 $a Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique in a Chemistry Classroom.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (60 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
500 $a Adviser: Jeffrey A. Webb.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Southern Connecticut State University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique, or IFAT, is a new testing system that turns a student's traditional multiple-choice testing into a chance for hands-on learning; and provides teachers with an opportunity to obtain more information about a student's knowledge during testing. In the current study we wanted to know if: When students are given the second-chance afforded by the IFAT system, are they guessing or using prior knowledge when making their second chance choice. Additionally, while there has been some adaptation of this testing system in non-science disciplines, we wanted to study if the IFAT-system would be well- received among faculty in the sciences, more specifically chemistry faculty. By comparing the students rate of success on second-chance afforded by the IFAT-system versus the statistical likelihood of guessing correctly, statistical analysis was used to determine if we observed enough students earning the second-chance points to reject the likelihood that students were randomly guessing. Our data analysis revealed that is statistically highly unlikely that students were only guessing when the IFAT system was utilized. (It is important to note that while we can find that students are getting the answer correct at a much higher rate than random guessing we can never truly know if every student is using thought or not.).
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Chemistry. $3 593913
650 4 $a Education. $3 555912
650 4 $a Science education. $3 1151737
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0485
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Southern Connecticut State University. $b Chemistry. $3 1195042
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-05(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10282632 $z click for full text (PQDT)