國立虎尾科技大學 |

Normativity in Law after Positivism.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Normativity in Law after Positivism./
作者:	Sauchelli, Ryan Thomas.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (190 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-03A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369228274

Normativity in Law after Positivism.
Sauchelli, Ryan Thomas.

Normativity in Law after Positivism. - 1 online resource (190 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

No legal tradition in history has developed an account of law and legal validity that compares in significance to that of legal positivism. Its most celebrated theorist in the 20th century, Hans Kelsen, conceptualizes legal validity as produced and reproduced within a self-referential system of law. Yet, by focusing on law's self-referentiality, i.e., norms legitimating other norms, his theory fails to account for the complex interplay between positive and non-positive norms, and how this interplay is related to legal validity. More specifically, the positivist conception of law cannot account for how non-positive practices of legal adjudication produce and reproduce legal validity. To address this problem, I develop a "post-positivist" approach to legal validity grounded in non-positive norms of legal adjudication. I discuss three normative theories of legal adjudication that provide non-positive, practice-based accounts of legal validity. The three theories of adjudication I discuss are those of Ronald Dworkin, Jurgen Habermas, and Rainer Forst. In conclusion, a post-positivist approach to law means keeping positivism's notion of self-referential legal validity, but introducing other normative inputs that compete with it without negating it in an on-going fashion.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369228274Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Normativity in Law after Positivism.
LDR:02479ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 920459
005 20181203094029.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369228274
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10168543
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uci:14180
035 $a AAI10168543
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Sauchelli, Ryan Thomas. $3 1195261
245 1 0 $a Normativity in Law after Positivism.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (190 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Kevin Olson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a No legal tradition in history has developed an account of law and legal validity that compares in significance to that of legal positivism. Its most celebrated theorist in the 20th century, Hans Kelsen, conceptualizes legal validity as produced and reproduced within a self-referential system of law. Yet, by focusing on law's self-referentiality, i.e., norms legitimating other norms, his theory fails to account for the complex interplay between positive and non-positive norms, and how this interplay is related to legal validity. More specifically, the positivist conception of law cannot account for how non-positive practices of legal adjudication produce and reproduce legal validity. To address this problem, I develop a "post-positivist" approach to legal validity grounded in non-positive norms of legal adjudication. I discuss three normative theories of legal adjudication that provide non-positive, practice-based accounts of legal validity. The three theories of adjudication I discuss are those of Ronald Dworkin, Jurgen Habermas, and Rainer Forst. In conclusion, a post-positivist approach to law means keeping positivism's notion of self-referential legal validity, but introducing other normative inputs that compete with it without negating it in an on-going fashion.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Irvine. $b Political Science. $3 1184641
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-03A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10168543 $z click for full text (PQDT)