國立虎尾科技大學 |

At the Limits of God-Talk : = Publics, Politics, Conversations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	At the Limits of God-Talk :/
其他題名:	Publics, Politics, Conversations.
作者:	Crump, Julius.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (438 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-11A(E).
標題:	Theology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438088696

At the Limits of God-Talk : = Publics, Politics, Conversations.
Crump, Julius.

At the Limits of God-Talk :Publics, Politics, Conversations. - 1 online resource (438 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Religion plays an influential role in American politics and public life. It tends to evoke disagreement and contentious debate about religious claims, practices and figures. Public religious leaders often presume their doctrinal commitments and theological referents to be unobjectionable. The social value of the aims of practices like prayer and penance are also presumed to be largely intolerant. Such claims and practices are often caricatured as the source or symptom of the vitality of public conversation. Theorists of public conversation obsess over how to address presumably unobjectionable ideas and intolerant practices that threaten the vitality of public conversation. Theologians and philosophers who would rather not engage in public conversation offer various reasons for arguing that religious enthusiasts should be prevented from participating in public conversation. By looking at Stanley Hauerwas's and Richard Rorty reasons for commending separation and privatization, respectively, this dissertation discovers similarities in their methods. By discerning conditions for dialogue and avoiding their methodological demands, this work turns discussions about America's civil religion to racial and cultural considerations. I assess the good of religion in politics by examining the place of limit-questions in public theology, in the first part of the project, and neopragmatic philosophy of religion, in the second part. I describe a practice of asking limit-questions called "inquisitive prayer" that can have devotional and social value. After redescribing Hauerwas's reasoning and rationally reconstructing Rorty's reasoning, those who commend privatization or separation from public conversation can see the value in the ways this protest practice expands what counts as normative in secular and religious contexts. Such an expansion is merited when conditions of dialogue are disclosed in ways that arguments for privatization and separation need not dismiss.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438088696Subjects--Topical Terms:

559813
Theology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

At the Limits of God-Talk : = Publics, Politics, Conversations.
LDR:03202ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 920515
005 20181203094031.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438088696
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10824200
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uchicago:14410
035 $a AAI10824200
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Crump, Julius. $3 1195341
245 1 0 $a At the Limits of God-Talk : $b Publics, Politics, Conversations.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (438 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Kevin Hector.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Religion plays an influential role in American politics and public life. It tends to evoke disagreement and contentious debate about religious claims, practices and figures. Public religious leaders often presume their doctrinal commitments and theological referents to be unobjectionable. The social value of the aims of practices like prayer and penance are also presumed to be largely intolerant. Such claims and practices are often caricatured as the source or symptom of the vitality of public conversation. Theorists of public conversation obsess over how to address presumably unobjectionable ideas and intolerant practices that threaten the vitality of public conversation. Theologians and philosophers who would rather not engage in public conversation offer various reasons for arguing that religious enthusiasts should be prevented from participating in public conversation. By looking at Stanley Hauerwas's and Richard Rorty reasons for commending separation and privatization, respectively, this dissertation discovers similarities in their methods. By discerning conditions for dialogue and avoiding their methodological demands, this work turns discussions about America's civil religion to racial and cultural considerations. I assess the good of religion in politics by examining the place of limit-questions in public theology, in the first part of the project, and neopragmatic philosophy of religion, in the second part. I describe a practice of asking limit-questions called "inquisitive prayer" that can have devotional and social value. After redescribing Hauerwas's reasoning and rationally reconstructing Rorty's reasoning, those who commend privatization or separation from public conversation can see the value in the ways this protest practice expands what counts as normative in secular and religious contexts. Such an expansion is merited when conditions of dialogue are disclosed in ways that arguments for privatization and separation need not dismiss.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Theology. $3 559813
650 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 671576
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0469
690 $a 0322
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Divinity. $3 1191407
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-11A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10824200 $z click for full text (PQDT)