語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Resolving higher education's effecti...
~
Fielding Graduate University.
Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas : = A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas :/
其他題名:
A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.
作者:
Leimer, Christina Lee.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (188 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: 4447.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International72-12A.
標題:
Higher education. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9781124890135
Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas : = A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.
Leimer, Christina Lee.
Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas :
A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations. - 1 online resource (188 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: 4447.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2011.
Includes bibliographical references
Higher education is "under fire" from policymakers, business leaders, and the public who are demanding accountability, improvement, and change. The academy's response has evoked charges of arrogance, insularity, and an unwillingness to be accountable or to change. The result has been frustration, resentment, and animosity for both policymakers and educators. In addition, this divide has inhibited productive dialogue and change. This study draws on the organizational effectiveness and neo-institutional theory literature to examine a set of policy-related documents produced by higher education stakeholders. Their goals and expectations for higher education and the cultural-cognitive characteristics of stakeholder groups that underlie their concept of effectiveness are explicated and compared in order to help resolve this dilemma. Results show that the conflict rests in fundamental differences in values, assumptions and beliefs between stakeholders. Higher education's external stakeholders are judging its effectiveness and setting expectations based on values and metrics that are largely incompatible with the nature of the academy but that are in line with contemporary U.S. sociocultural and economic ideology. Stakeholders within higher education see these effectiveness issues as best resolved internally in accordance with academic traditions, standards, and expertise. Demands originating externally are seen as potential threats to academic views and culture. Understanding the differing perspectives offers grounds for negotiation and illuminates implications for change in higher education. Recommendations for change are offered. These are general recommendations that focus on identifying and reconciling areas of disagreement and inclusion of all stakeholder voices. Specific methods of implementation are left to the professional judgment of practitioners who must apply them to particular settings and circumstances.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9781124890135Subjects--Topical Terms:
1148448
Higher education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas : = A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.
LDR
:03235ntm a2200349Ki 4500
001
920566
005
20181203094032.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2011 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9781124890135
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3473952
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)fielding:10233
035
$a
AAI3473952
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Leimer, Christina Lee.
$3
1195407
245
1 0
$a
Resolving higher education's effectiveness dilemmas :
$b
A cultural analysis of stakeholder expectations.
264
0
$c
2011
300
$a
1 online resource (188 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: 4447.
500
$a
Adviser: Anna M. DiStefano.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2011.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Higher education is "under fire" from policymakers, business leaders, and the public who are demanding accountability, improvement, and change. The academy's response has evoked charges of arrogance, insularity, and an unwillingness to be accountable or to change. The result has been frustration, resentment, and animosity for both policymakers and educators. In addition, this divide has inhibited productive dialogue and change. This study draws on the organizational effectiveness and neo-institutional theory literature to examine a set of policy-related documents produced by higher education stakeholders. Their goals and expectations for higher education and the cultural-cognitive characteristics of stakeholder groups that underlie their concept of effectiveness are explicated and compared in order to help resolve this dilemma. Results show that the conflict rests in fundamental differences in values, assumptions and beliefs between stakeholders. Higher education's external stakeholders are judging its effectiveness and setting expectations based on values and metrics that are largely incompatible with the nature of the academy but that are in line with contemporary U.S. sociocultural and economic ideology. Stakeholders within higher education see these effectiveness issues as best resolved internally in accordance with academic traditions, standards, and expertise. Demands originating externally are seen as potential threats to academic views and culture. Understanding the differing perspectives offers grounds for negotiation and illuminates implications for change in higher education. Recommendations for change are offered. These are general recommendations that focus on identifying and reconciling areas of disagreement and inclusion of all stakeholder voices. Specific methods of implementation are left to the professional judgment of practitioners who must apply them to particular settings and circumstances.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Higher education.
$3
1148448
650
4
$a
Higher education administration.
$3
1148709
650
4
$a
Education policy.
$3
1107727
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0745
690
$a
0446
690
$a
0458
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Fielding Graduate University.
$b
The School of Human and Organization Development.
$3
1179903
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
72-12A.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3473952
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入