國立虎尾科技大學 |

Towards a cultural psychology of religion : = Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Towards a cultural psychology of religion :/
Reminder of title:	Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
Author:	Cortez, Neil Andrew C.
Description:	1 online resource (109 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-01B(E).
Subject:	Clinical psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339021966

Towards a cultural psychology of religion : = Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
Cortez, Neil Andrew C.

Towards a cultural psychology of religion :Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity. - 1 online resource (109 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology, 2015.

Includes bibliographical references

Current psychological research into religiosity can be located into two paradigms: the cross-cultural psychology interpretive tradition and the cultural psychology interpretive tradition. To generate support for the latter paradigm, American and Mainland Chinese respondents were asked to describe a religious or spiritual other as a way of exploring the impact of individualism-collectivism cultural values on expressions of religiosity. Statements from Chinese respondents were expected to have more socially related content compared to American respondents. Responses were analyzed using a linguistic analysis computer program with attention given to social process, family, friends, and humans content. Raters were also instructed to generate categories based on the content of the responses. No significant differences were found between American and Mainland Chinese respondents on all four content categories. Religious self-rating was found to significantly predict family content, while religious and spiritual self-ratings significantly predicted humans content. Raters also generated 11 categories from American responses, and 10 categories from Mainland Chinese responses. Methodological and theoretical implications are also discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339021966Subjects--Topical Terms:

649607
Clinical psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Towards a cultural psychology of religion : = Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
LDR:02588ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 920584
005 20181203094032.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2015 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339021966
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3721026
035 $a (MiAaPQ)fuller.psych:10119
035 $a AAI3721026
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cortez, Neil Andrew C. $3 1195430
245 1 0 $a Towards a cultural psychology of religion : $b Differences between American and Chinese expressions on religiosity.
264 0 $c 2015
300 $a 1 online resource (109 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-01(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Alvin C. Dueck.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology, 2015.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Current psychological research into religiosity can be located into two paradigms: the cross-cultural psychology interpretive tradition and the cultural psychology interpretive tradition. To generate support for the latter paradigm, American and Mainland Chinese respondents were asked to describe a religious or spiritual other as a way of exploring the impact of individualism-collectivism cultural values on expressions of religiosity. Statements from Chinese respondents were expected to have more socially related content compared to American respondents. Responses were analyzed using a linguistic analysis computer program with attention given to social process, family, friends, and humans content. Raters were also instructed to generate categories based on the content of the responses. No significant differences were found between American and Mainland Chinese respondents on all four content categories. Religious self-rating was found to significantly predict family content, while religious and spiritual self-ratings significantly predicted humans content. Raters also generated 11 categories from American responses, and 10 categories from Mainland Chinese responses. Methodological and theoretical implications are also discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 649607
650 4 $a Religion. $3 555020
650 4 $a Cultural anthropology. $3 1179959
650 4 $a Spirituality. $3 555490
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0318
690 $a 0326
690 $a 0647
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology. $b Clinical Psychology. $3 1188470
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-01B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3721026 $z click for full text (PQDT)