國立虎尾科技大學 |

Asymmetry and Elastic Sovereignty in the Qing Tributary World : = Criminals and Refugees in Three Borderlands, 1630s-1840s.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Asymmetry and Elastic Sovereignty in the Qing Tributary World :/
其他題名:	Criminals and Refugees in Three Borderlands, 1630s-1840s.
作者:	Kim, Jaymin.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (382 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-12A(E).
標題:	Asian history. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438126312

Asymmetry and Elastic Sovereignty in the Qing Tributary World : = Criminals and Refugees in Three Borderlands, 1630s-1840s.
Kim, Jaymin.

Asymmetry and Elastic Sovereignty in the Qing Tributary World :Criminals and Refugees in Three Borderlands, 1630s-1840s. - 1 online resource (382 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation analyzes how Qing China (1636-1912) and three of its tributary states (Chos?n Korea, Vietnam, Kokand) handled interstate refugees and criminals from the 1630s to the 1840s. I use Classical Chinese and Manchu memorials and diplomatic documents from Qing archives in Beijing and Taipei as well as Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese published sources to construct a bilateral view of these interstate relations and compare them. My research reveals multiple, flexible, and shifting conceptions of boundaries, jurisdiction, and sovereignty. Boundaries between Qing and its tributaries were not absolute to a Qing court that claimed universal rule, and the court often erased them by adopting tributary refugees as Qing subjects or encroaching on tributary domains. Further, the Qing court often asserted jurisdiction over tributary subjects committing crimes on its soil or against its subjects. In contrast, no tributary court openly asserted jurisdiction over Qing subjects. Together, these cases reveal two defining characteristics of the Qing tributary order: asymmetry and elastic sovereignty. They show how the political norms of early modern Asia defy post-Westphalian norms of inter-state equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of fellow sovereign states.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438126312Subjects--Topical Terms:

810327
Asian history.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Asymmetry and Elastic Sovereignty in the Qing Tributary World : = Criminals and Refugees in Three Borderlands, 1630s-1840s.
LDR:03376ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 920889
005 20181203094404.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438126312
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10903025
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham:001242
035 $a AAI10903025
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Kim, Jaymin. $3 1195815
245 1 0 $a Asymmetry and Elastic Sovereignty in the Qing Tributary World : $b Criminals and Refugees in Three Borderlands, 1630s-1840s.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (382 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Par Kristoffer Cassel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation analyzes how Qing China (1636-1912) and three of its tributary states (Chos?n Korea, Vietnam, Kokand) handled interstate refugees and criminals from the 1630s to the 1840s. I use Classical Chinese and Manchu memorials and diplomatic documents from Qing archives in Beijing and Taipei as well as Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese published sources to construct a bilateral view of these interstate relations and compare them. My research reveals multiple, flexible, and shifting conceptions of boundaries, jurisdiction, and sovereignty. Boundaries between Qing and its tributaries were not absolute to a Qing court that claimed universal rule, and the court often erased them by adopting tributary refugees as Qing subjects or encroaching on tributary domains. Further, the Qing court often asserted jurisdiction over tributary subjects committing crimes on its soil or against its subjects. In contrast, no tributary court openly asserted jurisdiction over Qing subjects. Together, these cases reveal two defining characteristics of the Qing tributary order: asymmetry and elastic sovereignty. They show how the political norms of early modern Asia defy post-Westphalian norms of inter-state equality and non-interference in the internal affairs of fellow sovereign states.
520 $a This work breaks new ground in Chinese history by highlighting Qing imperial projects outside today's Chinese borders and by comparing borderlands in Northeast, Southeast, and Central Asia. It is also a work of world history that combines the connective method and the comparative method in a novel way, focusing on interactions across interstate boundaries in Asia while comparing these Asian borderlands with those in other early modern empires such as Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Lastly, my work engages with the field of international relations by reconstructing the contours of interstate affairs in early modern Asia before the introduction of public international law to the region, thus answering the recent call by scholars for a more inclusive, pluralistic view of international relations.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Asian history. $2 bicssc $3 810327
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0332
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b History. $3 1183300
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-12A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10903025 $z click for full text (PQDT)