語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Commonsense pluralism about truth = ...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Commonsense pluralism about truth = an empirical defence /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Commonsense pluralism about truth/ by Joseph Ulatowski.
其他題名:
an empirical defence /
作者:
Ulatowski, Joseph.
出版者:
Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2017.,
面頁冊數:
xxv, 140 p. :ill., digital ; : 22 cm.;
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Truth. -
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
ISBN:
9783319694658
Commonsense pluralism about truth = an empirical defence /
Ulatowski, Joseph.
Commonsense pluralism about truth
an empirical defence /[electronic resource] :by Joseph Ulatowski. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xxv, 140 p. :ill., digital ;22 cm.
Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: On the "Common Conception" of Truth -- Chapter 3: A Defence of Descriptive Metaphysics -- Chapter 4: An Ecological Approach in Experimental Philosophy -- Chapter 5: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth (Endoxic Alethic Pluralism) Chapter 6: Challenging Endoxic Alethic Pluralism.
Truth is a pervasive feature of ordinary language, deserving of systematic study, and few theorists of truth have endeavoured to chronicle the tousled conceptual terrain forming the non-philosopher's ordinary view. In this book, the author recasts the philosophical treatment of truth in light of historical and recent work in experimental philosophy. He argues that the commonsense view of truth is deeply fragmented along two axes, across different linguistic discourses and among different demographics, termed in the book as endoxic alethic pluralism. To defend this view, four conclusions must be reached: (1) endoxic alethic pluralism should be compatible with how the everyday person uses truth, (2) the common conception of truth should be derivable from empirical data, (3) this descriptive metaphysical project is one aspect of a normative theory of truth, and (4) endoxic alethic pluralism is at least partially immune to challenges facing the ecological method in experimental philosophy and alethic pluralism.
ISBN: 9783319694658
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
559770
Truth.
LC Class. No.: BD171 / .U38 2017
Dewey Class. No.: 121
Commonsense pluralism about truth = an empirical defence /
LDR
:02312nam a2200325 a 4500
001
922272
003
DE-He213
005
20180530111139.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
190624s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783319694658
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783319694641
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-69465-8
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
BD171
$b
.U38 2017
072
7
$a
CFA
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PHI021000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
LAN000000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
121
$2
23
090
$a
BD171
$b
.U36 2017
100
1
$a
Ulatowski, Joseph.
$3
1197718
245
1 0
$a
Commonsense pluralism about truth
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
an empirical defence /
$c
by Joseph Ulatowski.
260
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
$c
2017.
300
$a
xxv, 140 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
22 cm.
505
0
$a
Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: On the "Common Conception" of Truth -- Chapter 3: A Defence of Descriptive Metaphysics -- Chapter 4: An Ecological Approach in Experimental Philosophy -- Chapter 5: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth (Endoxic Alethic Pluralism) Chapter 6: Challenging Endoxic Alethic Pluralism.
520
$a
Truth is a pervasive feature of ordinary language, deserving of systematic study, and few theorists of truth have endeavoured to chronicle the tousled conceptual terrain forming the non-philosopher's ordinary view. In this book, the author recasts the philosophical treatment of truth in light of historical and recent work in experimental philosophy. He argues that the commonsense view of truth is deeply fragmented along two axes, across different linguistic discourses and among different demographics, termed in the book as endoxic alethic pluralism. To defend this view, four conclusions must be reached: (1) endoxic alethic pluralism should be compatible with how the everyday person uses truth, (2) the common conception of truth should be derivable from empirical data, (3) this descriptive metaphysical project is one aspect of a normative theory of truth, and (4) endoxic alethic pluralism is at least partially immune to challenges facing the ecological method in experimental philosophy and alethic pluralism.
650
0
$a
Truth.
$3
559770
650
0
$a
Pluralism.
$2
itrt
$3
574876
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
559771
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Language.
$3
671588
650
2 4
$a
Metaphysics.
$3
555859
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
950
$a
Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入