國立虎尾科技大學 |

Supervenience and normativity

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Supervenience and normativity/ edited by Bartosz Brozek, Antonino Rotolo, Jerzy Stelmach.
其他作者:	Brozek, Bartosz.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2017.,
面頁冊數:	ix, 175 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Supervenience (Philosophy) -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61046-7
ISBN:	9783319610467

Supervenience and normativity
Supervenience and normativity[electronic resource] /edited by Bartosz Brozek, Antonino Rotolo, Jerzy Stelmach. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - ix, 175 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Law and philosophy library,v.1201572-4395 ;. - Law and philosophy library ;v.99..

The present collection represents an attempt to bring together several contributions to the ongoing debate pertaining to supervenience of the normative in law and morals and strives to be the first work that addresses the topic comprehensively. It addresses the controversies surrounding the idea of normative supervenience and the philosophical conceptions they generated, deserve a recapitulation, as well as a new impulse for further development. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the concepts of normativity and supervenience. The research on normativity - a term introduced to the philosophical jargon by Edmund Husserl almost one hundred years ago - gained impetus in the 1990s through the works of such philosophers as Robert Audi, Christine Korsgaard, Robert Brandom, Paul Boghossian or Joseph Raz. The problem of the nature and sources of normativity has been investigated not only in morals and in relation to language, but also in other domains, e.g. in law or in the c ontext of the theories of rationality. Supervenience, understood as a special kind of relation between properties and weaker than entailment, has become analytic philosophers' favorite formal tool since 1980s. It features in the theories pertaining to mental properties, but also in aesthetics or the law. In recent years, the 'marriage' of normativity and supervenience has become an object of many philosophical theories as well as heated debates. It seems that the conceptual apparatus of the supervenience theory makes it possible to state precisely some claims pertaining to normativity, as well as illuminate the problems surrounding it.

ISBN: 9783319610467

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-61046-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

577053
Supervenience (Philosophy)

LC Class. No.: K235

Dewey Class. No.: 340.1

Supervenience and normativity
LDR:02652nam a2200325 a 4500 001 924264
003 DE-He213
005 20180329141448.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190625s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319610467 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319610450 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-61046-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-61046-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K235
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW079000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.1 $2 23
090 $a K235 $b .S959 2017
245 0 0 $a Supervenience and normativity $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Bartosz Brozek, Antonino Rotolo, Jerzy Stelmach.
260 $a Cham : $c 2017. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a ix, 175 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Law and philosophy library, $x 1572-4395 ; $v v.120
520 $a The present collection represents an attempt to bring together several contributions to the ongoing debate pertaining to supervenience of the normative in law and morals and strives to be the first work that addresses the topic comprehensively. It addresses the controversies surrounding the idea of normative supervenience and the philosophical conceptions they generated, deserve a recapitulation, as well as a new impulse for further development. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the concepts of normativity and supervenience. The research on normativity - a term introduced to the philosophical jargon by Edmund Husserl almost one hundred years ago - gained impetus in the 1990s through the works of such philosophers as Robert Audi, Christine Korsgaard, Robert Brandom, Paul Boghossian or Joseph Raz. The problem of the nature and sources of normativity has been investigated not only in morals and in relation to language, but also in other domains, e.g. in law or in the c ontext of the theories of rationality. Supervenience, understood as a special kind of relation between properties and weaker than entailment, has become analytic philosophers' favorite formal tool since 1980s. It features in the theories pertaining to mental properties, but also in aesthetics or the law. In recent years, the 'marriage' of normativity and supervenience has become an object of many philosophical theories as well as heated debates. It seems that the conceptual apparatus of the supervenience theory makes it possible to state precisely some claims pertaining to normativity, as well as illuminate the problems surrounding it.
650 0 $a Supervenience (Philosophy) $3 577053
650 0 $a Normativity (Ethics) $3 592353
650 0 $a Law $x Philosophy. $3 556912
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 671683
650 2 4 $a Moral Philosophy. $3 1106986
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 668203
650 2 4 $a Logic. $3 558909
700 1 $a Brozek, Bartosz. $3 1201134
700 1 $a Rotolo, Antonino. $3 1201135
700 1 $a Stelmach, Jerzy. $3 1201136
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Law and philosophy library ; $v v.99. $3 884895
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61046-7
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)