國立虎尾科技大學 |

How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning/ edited by Matyas Bencze, Gar Yein Ng.
other author:	Bencze, Matyas.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2018.,
Description:	viii, 268 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Judicial process. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6
ISBN:	9783319973166

How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning[electronic resource] /edited by Matyas Bencze, Gar Yein Ng. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - viii, 268 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,v.691534-6781 ;. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ;v.10..

Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities - Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.

This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book.

ISBN: 9783319973166

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

799855
Judicial process.

LC Class. No.: K2146 / .H698 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 347.014

How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
LDR:03700nam a2200349 a 4500 001 928558
003 DE-He213
005 20190227114523.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190626s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319973166 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319973159 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-97316-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K2146 $b .H698 2018
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.014 $2 23
090 $a K2146 $b .H847 2018
245 0 0 $a How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Matyas Bencze, Gar Yein Ng.
260 $a Cham : $c 2018. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a viii, 268 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v v.69
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities - Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.
520 $a This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book.
650 0 $a Judicial process. $3 799855
650 0 $a Justice, Administration of. $3 575464
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 816047
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
700 1 $a Bencze, Matyas. $3 1208610
700 1 $a Ng, Gar Yein. $3 1208611
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ; $v v.10. $3 887880
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)