國立虎尾科技大學 |

Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultation = the Zadeh Project /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultation/ edited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton.
Reminder of title:	the Zadeh Project /
other author:	Finder, Stuart G.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2018.,
Description:	xi, 228 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Medical ethics consultation. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
ISBN:	9783319909554

Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultation = the Zadeh Project /
Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultationthe Zadeh Project /[electronic resource] :edited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xi, 228 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction; Bliton & Finder -- Case Scenario; Finder -- Critical commentary on scenario; Armstrong, Frolic & Rubin, Hynds, Rosell & Johnson, Tarzian, Tsai -- Method; Agich, Aulisio, Hurst, Rasmussen -- Critical commentary on method; Bishop, Molewijk, Reiter-Theil -- Conclusion - Bliton & Finder.

Open access.

This open access book about the Zadeh Project demonstrates and explores a core question in clinical ethics: how can ethics consultants be accountable in the face of a robust plurality of ethical standpoints, especially those that underwrite practices and methods for doing ethics consultation as well as those viewpoints and values encountered in daily clinical ethics practice? Underscoring this question is the recognition that the field of clinical ethics consultation has arrived at a crucial point in its maturation. Many efforts are underway to more formally "professionalize" the field, with most aimed toward stabilizing a specific set of institutional considerations. Stretched between these institutional and practical initiatives resides a crucial set of of ethical considerations, chief among them the meaning and scope of responsibility for clinical ethics consultants. Developed around a long-form case scenario, the Zadeh Project provides a multi-layered series of "peer-reviews": critique of the actions of the case scenario's ethics consultant; reflection on clinical ethics method; examination of the many ways that commitments to method and practice can, and do, intersect, overlap, and alter one another. The design and format of this book thus models a key element for clinical ethics practice: the need and ability to provide careful and thoughtful explanation of core moral considerations that emerge among diverse standpoints. Specifically designed for those studying to become and those who are ethics consultants, this book, with its innovative and multi-layered approach, allows readers to share a peer-review-like experience that shows accountability to be what it is, an ethical, not merely procedural or administrative, undertaking.

ISBN: 9783319909554

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1200527
Medical ethics consultation.

LC Class. No.: R724 / .P447 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 174.2

Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultation = the Zadeh Project /
LDR:03132nam a2200337 a 4500 001 929310
003 DE-He213
005 20190319135814.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190626s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319909554 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319909530 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-90955-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a R724 $b .P447 2018
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 174.2 $2 23
090 $a R724 $b .P375 2018
245 0 0 $a Peer review, peer education, and modeling in the practice of clinical ethics consultation $h [electronic resource] : $b the Zadeh Project / $c edited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton.
260 $a Cham : $c 2018. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a xi, 228 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction; Bliton & Finder -- Case Scenario; Finder -- Critical commentary on scenario; Armstrong, Frolic & Rubin, Hynds, Rosell & Johnson, Tarzian, Tsai -- Method; Agich, Aulisio, Hurst, Rasmussen -- Critical commentary on method; Bishop, Molewijk, Reiter-Theil -- Conclusion - Bliton & Finder.
506 $a Open access.
520 $a This open access book about the Zadeh Project demonstrates and explores a core question in clinical ethics: how can ethics consultants be accountable in the face of a robust plurality of ethical standpoints, especially those that underwrite practices and methods for doing ethics consultation as well as those viewpoints and values encountered in daily clinical ethics practice? Underscoring this question is the recognition that the field of clinical ethics consultation has arrived at a crucial point in its maturation. Many efforts are underway to more formally "professionalize" the field, with most aimed toward stabilizing a specific set of institutional considerations. Stretched between these institutional and practical initiatives resides a crucial set of of ethical considerations, chief among them the meaning and scope of responsibility for clinical ethics consultants. Developed around a long-form case scenario, the Zadeh Project provides a multi-layered series of "peer-reviews": critique of the actions of the case scenario's ethics consultant; reflection on clinical ethics method; examination of the many ways that commitments to method and practice can, and do, intersect, overlap, and alter one another. The design and format of this book thus models a key element for clinical ethics practice: the need and ability to provide careful and thoughtful explanation of core moral considerations that emerge among diverse standpoints. Specifically designed for those studying to become and those who are ethics consultants, this book, with its innovative and multi-layered approach, allows readers to share a peer-review-like experience that shows accountability to be what it is, an ethical, not merely procedural or administrative, undertaking.
650 0 $a Medical ethics consultation. $3 1200527
650 1 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 2 4 $a Health Administration. $3 677396
700 1 $a Finder, Stuart G. $3 1209741
700 1 $a Bliton, Mark J. $3 1209742
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)