國立虎尾科技大學 |

Precedent and statute = lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Precedent and statute/ by Orlin Yalnazov.
其他題名:	lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /
作者:	Yalnazov, Orlin.
出版者:	Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : : 2018.,
面頁冊數:	xi, 345 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Law and economics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
ISBN:	9783658243852

Precedent and statute = lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /
Yalnazov, Orlin.

Precedent and statutelawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /[electronic resource] :by Orlin Yalnazov. - Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :2018. - xi, 345 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law,2524-7360. - Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law..

Two Types of Legal Uncertainty -- Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction -- Fact, Law, and Legal Change -- Remoteness in Contract -- Metarules versus Metastandards -- Precedent in the Civil and Common Law.

Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The 'technologies' between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the 'efficiency of the common law' hypothesis. Contents Two Types of Legal Uncertainty Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction Fact, Law, and Legal Change Remoteness in Contract Metarules versus Metastandards Precedent in the Civil and Common Law Target Groups Researchers, students, and practitioners in the fields of law, economics, and legal philosophy The Author Orlin Yalnazov was born in Varna. He holds a PhD in Law & Economics, awarded jointly by Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universitat Hamburg, and Universita di Bologna, as well as an LLM from the University of Cambridge and an LLB from Durham University. He works at the University of Hull.

ISBN: 9783658243852

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

560301
Law and economics.

LC Class. No.: HB73 / .Y356 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 330

Precedent and statute = lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /
LDR:02776nam a2200349 a 4500 001 929660
003 DE-He213
005 20190322103159.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190626s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783658243852 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783658243845 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-658-24385-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HB73 $b .Y356 2018
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW014000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
072 7 $a LNC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 330 $2 23
090 $a HB73 $b .Y19 2018
100 1 $a Yalnazov, Orlin. $3 1210325
245 1 0 $a Precedent and statute $h [electronic resource] : $b lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament / $c by Orlin Yalnazov.
260 $a Wiesbaden : $b Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : $b Imprint: Springer Gabler, $c 2018.
300 $a xi, 345 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law, $x 2524-7360
505 0 $a Two Types of Legal Uncertainty -- Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction -- Fact, Law, and Legal Change -- Remoteness in Contract -- Metarules versus Metastandards -- Precedent in the Civil and Common Law.
520 $a Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The 'technologies' between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the 'efficiency of the common law' hypothesis. Contents Two Types of Legal Uncertainty Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction Fact, Law, and Legal Change Remoteness in Contract Metarules versus Metastandards Precedent in the Civil and Common Law Target Groups Researchers, students, and practitioners in the fields of law, economics, and legal philosophy The Author Orlin Yalnazov was born in Varna. He holds a PhD in Law & Economics, awarded jointly by Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universitat Hamburg, and Universita di Bologna, as well as an LLM from the University of Cambridge and an LLB from Durham University. He works at the University of Hull.
650 0 $a Law and economics. $3 560301
650 1 4 $a Law and Economics. $3 669261
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law. $3 1210326
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
950 $a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)