國立虎尾科技大學 |

Comparative Bio-economic Impact on Rural Transit Highways from Commuter Transit Types.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparative Bio-economic Impact on Rural Transit Highways from Commuter Transit Types./
作者:	Heath, Jeffrey K.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	111 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-02A(E).
標題:	Transportation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787174
ISBN:	9780438393264

Comparative Bio-economic Impact on Rural Transit Highways from Commuter Transit Types.
Heath, Jeffrey K.

Comparative Bio-economic Impact on Rural Transit Highways from Commuter Transit Types. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 111 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Idaho, 2018.

The purpose of this study is to examine the bio-economic components affecting the several transit systems sponsored by the Department of Energy at their three remote sites in Idaho, Nevada, and New Mexico. Significant economic data was developed prior to and in conjunction with this research. Therefore, the primary focus if this research is on the non-economic factors and their effect on the overall bio-economic view of the transit system identified. Due to a prevailing assumption that one transit type was superior to others, the resultant Null Hypothesis was created to test the validity of this claim and to function as the framework for this research; as stated herein: there is not a quantifiable difference in bio-economic impact between busing versus carpooling with regard to enhanced safety, reduced environmental impact, or positive economics per user unit. As summarized in a final ranking of transportation types and ranked within the several key hypothesis effecting factors, this research overwhelmingly proved the Null Hypothesis false. The mass transit systems (buses) in place at the Idaho and Nevada sites remain superior to other transit forms in common use by commuters within the rural transit highway system studied. Limited but representative busing capability at the New Mexico site, ranks second overall in transit superiority. This research did not note any difference between the Government-provided service, like that found in Idaho and New Mexico, versus a commercially-provided service, like that found in Nevada. This research compiles the body of knowledge and demonstrated rigor needed to developed a framework to support further transit research to test if there is another more superior system to be used, perhaps rail.

ISBN: 9780438393264Subjects--Topical Terms:

558117
Transportation.

Comparative Bio-economic Impact on Rural Transit Highways from Commuter Transit Types.
LDR:02728nam a2200313 4500 001 931652
005 20190716101634.5
008 190815s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438393264
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10787174
035 $a (MiAaPQ)idaho:11357
035 $a AAI10787174
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Heath, Jeffrey K. $3 1213848
245 1 0 $a Comparative Bio-economic Impact on Rural Transit Highways from Commuter Transit Types.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 111 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Lee Ostrom.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Idaho, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this study is to examine the bio-economic components affecting the several transit systems sponsored by the Department of Energy at their three remote sites in Idaho, Nevada, and New Mexico. Significant economic data was developed prior to and in conjunction with this research. Therefore, the primary focus if this research is on the non-economic factors and their effect on the overall bio-economic view of the transit system identified. Due to a prevailing assumption that one transit type was superior to others, the resultant Null Hypothesis was created to test the validity of this claim and to function as the framework for this research; as stated herein: there is not a quantifiable difference in bio-economic impact between busing versus carpooling with regard to enhanced safety, reduced environmental impact, or positive economics per user unit. As summarized in a final ranking of transportation types and ranked within the several key hypothesis effecting factors, this research overwhelmingly proved the Null Hypothesis false. The mass transit systems (buses) in place at the Idaho and Nevada sites remain superior to other transit forms in common use by commuters within the rural transit highway system studied. Limited but representative busing capability at the New Mexico site, ranks second overall in transit superiority. This research did not note any difference between the Government-provided service, like that found in Idaho and New Mexico, versus a commercially-provided service, like that found in Nevada. This research compiles the body of knowledge and demonstrated rigor needed to developed a framework to support further transit research to test if there is another more superior system to be used, perhaps rail.
590 $a School code: 0089.
650 4 $a Transportation. $3 558117
650 4 $a Industrial engineering. $3 679492
650 4 $a Environmental engineering. $3 557376
690 $a 0709
690 $a 0546
690 $a 0775
710 2 $a University of Idaho. $b Biological & Agricultural Engineering. $3 1213849
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-02A(E).
790 $a 0089
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787174