國立虎尾科技大學 |

Analysis of User Preference with N95 and Powered Air-Purifying Respirators in a Healthcare Work Environment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Analysis of User Preference with N95 and Powered Air-Purifying Respirators in a Healthcare Work Environment./
作者:	Carver, Brittany.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-09.
標題:	Industrial engineering. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27786937
ISBN:	9781392657256

Analysis of User Preference with N95 and Powered Air-Purifying Respirators in a Healthcare Work Environment.
Carver, Brittany.

Analysis of User Preference with N95 and Powered Air-Purifying Respirators in a Healthcare Work Environment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 65 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09.

Thesis (M.S.)--West Virginia University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

For those working in the healthcare field, personal protective equipment is vital. Healthcare workers are often first responders when it comes to dealing with patients who are infected or when a disease outbreak occurs. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires all healthcare operations to provide employee protection against blood borne pathogens. With the increase of life-threatening disease outbreaks, such as SARS in 2003 and Ebola in 2014, it is of the upmost importance to make sure respirators are best suited for users and acceptable for long term use. It has been shown through previous studies that due to certain factors, respirator user non-compliance is common. Such factors include but are not limited to headaches, thermal discomfort, eye discomfort, interference with duties, etc. By conducting the current study, data was collected on the above factors based off of user opinions of respirators. This study set out to determine if there was significant difference between sixteen different categories, which included rating respirators. The study included four respirators: one filtering face piece respirator (FFR) and three powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR’s). Subjects recruited were healthcare workers and had prior knowledge of respirators. Subjects conducted the study at a simulation laboratory and each subject was instructed to wear each of the four respirators and perform a list of tasks common to HCW’s. After completing all tasks, subjects completed a questionnaire based on each respirator. Results showed that the N95 mask was preferred over PAPR’s in five of sixteen categories. Within the PAPR’s themselves, MAXAIR performed slightly better than Airmate, while Versaflo typically was outperformed by all respirators.

ISBN: 9781392657256Subjects--Topical Terms:

679492
Industrial engineering.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Occupational safety and health administration

Analysis of User Preference with N95 and Powered Air-Purifying Respirators in a Healthcare Work Environment.
LDR:02947nam a2200349 4500 001 951901
005 20200821052222.5
008 200914s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392657256
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27786937
035 $a (MiAaPQ)WVirginia4776
035 $a AAI27786937
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carver, Brittany. $3 1241398
245 1 0 $a Analysis of User Preference with N95 and Powered Air-Purifying Respirators in a Healthcare Work Environment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09.
500 $a Advisor: He, X. Kevin;Guffey, Steven.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--West Virginia University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a For those working in the healthcare field, personal protective equipment is vital. Healthcare workers are often first responders when it comes to dealing with patients who are infected or when a disease outbreak occurs. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires all healthcare operations to provide employee protection against blood borne pathogens. With the increase of life-threatening disease outbreaks, such as SARS in 2003 and Ebola in 2014, it is of the upmost importance to make sure respirators are best suited for users and acceptable for long term use. It has been shown through previous studies that due to certain factors, respirator user non-compliance is common. Such factors include but are not limited to headaches, thermal discomfort, eye discomfort, interference with duties, etc. By conducting the current study, data was collected on the above factors based off of user opinions of respirators. This study set out to determine if there was significant difference between sixteen different categories, which included rating respirators. The study included four respirators: one filtering face piece respirator (FFR) and three powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR’s). Subjects recruited were healthcare workers and had prior knowledge of respirators. Subjects conducted the study at a simulation laboratory and each subject was instructed to wear each of the four respirators and perform a list of tasks common to HCW’s. After completing all tasks, subjects completed a questionnaire based on each respirator. Results showed that the N95 mask was preferred over PAPR’s in five of sixteen categories. Within the PAPR’s themselves, MAXAIR performed slightly better than Airmate, while Versaflo typically was outperformed by all respirators.
590 $a School code: 0256.
650 4 $a Industrial engineering. $3 679492
650 4 $a Systems management. $3 1241399
650 4 $a Hygiene. $3 566045
653 $a Occupational safety and health administration
653 $a First responders
653 $a Respirators
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0546
710 2 $a West Virginia University. $3 1187945
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-09.
790 $a 0256
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27786937