國立虎尾科技大學 |

The effects of political institutions on varieties of capitalism

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effects of political institutions on varieties of capitalism/ by Matthew P. Arsenault.
作者:	Arsenault, Matthew P.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2017.,
面頁冊數:	xi, 204 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Capitalism - Political aspects. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4
ISBN:	9783319508924

The effects of political institutions on varieties of capitalism
Arsenault, Matthew P.

The effects of political institutions on varieties of capitalism[electronic resource] /by Matthew P. Arsenault. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xi, 204 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Political Institutions and Varieties of Capitalism -- 2. A Political Approach to Explaining Variation in Capitalist Systems -- 3. A Mixed-Method Approach to Capitalist Variation -- 4. A Quantitative Analysis of Varieties of Capitalism -- 5. Political Institutions and Economic Reforms: Britain and Germany -- 6. The Economic Effects of Electoral Reform: New Zealand -- 7. Conclusion.

This book identifies and explores the mechanisms linking political institutions and variation in capitalist systems. A strong correlation exists between varieties of political regimes and varieties of capitalism: majoritarian political regimes are correlated with liberal market economies (LMEs) and consensus political regimes are correlated with coordinated market economies (CMEs) Still, correlation is not causation. Empirical findings illustrate that partisanship and policy legacies, the number of political parties, electoral rules, and constitutional constraints are significant indicators of LMEs and CMEs. Arsenault finds that majoritarian institutions create an environment of adversarial politics and strong competition between actors, which makes credible commitment to nonmarket coordination mechanisms unlikely. Consensus institutions, on the other hand, promote an atmosphere of cooperation and coordination between actors, thus encouraging credible commitment to nonmarket coordination mechanisms. Qualitative case studies of Germany, Britain, and New Zealand confirm the quantitative findings and suggest that political regimes were instrumental in shaping the economic adjustment paths of these countries during the era of liberalization in the 1980s.

ISBN: 9783319508924

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

870884
Capitalism
--Political aspects.

LC Class. No.: HB501 / .A77 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 330.122

The effects of political institutions on varieties of capitalism
LDR:02644nam a2200325 a 4500 001 958903
003 DE-He213
005 20170210142514.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 201118s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319508924 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319508917 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-50892-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HB501 $b .A77 2017
072 7 $a KCS $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS069000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a BUS023000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 330.122 $2 23
090 $a HB501 $b .A781 2017
100 1 $a Arsenault, Matthew P. $3 1251305
245 1 4 $a The effects of political institutions on varieties of capitalism $h [electronic resource] / $c by Matthew P. Arsenault.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2017.
300 $a xi, 204 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Political Institutions and Varieties of Capitalism -- 2. A Political Approach to Explaining Variation in Capitalist Systems -- 3. A Mixed-Method Approach to Capitalist Variation -- 4. A Quantitative Analysis of Varieties of Capitalism -- 5. Political Institutions and Economic Reforms: Britain and Germany -- 6. The Economic Effects of Electoral Reform: New Zealand -- 7. Conclusion.
520 $a This book identifies and explores the mechanisms linking political institutions and variation in capitalist systems. A strong correlation exists between varieties of political regimes and varieties of capitalism: majoritarian political regimes are correlated with liberal market economies (LMEs) and consensus political regimes are correlated with coordinated market economies (CMEs) Still, correlation is not causation. Empirical findings illustrate that partisanship and policy legacies, the number of political parties, electoral rules, and constitutional constraints are significant indicators of LMEs and CMEs. Arsenault finds that majoritarian institutions create an environment of adversarial politics and strong competition between actors, which makes credible commitment to nonmarket coordination mechanisms unlikely. Consensus institutions, on the other hand, promote an atmosphere of cooperation and coordination between actors, thus encouraging credible commitment to nonmarket coordination mechanisms. Qualitative case studies of Germany, Britain, and New Zealand confirm the quantitative findings and suggest that political regimes were instrumental in shaping the economic adjustment paths of these countries during the era of liberalization in the 1980s.
650 0 $a Capitalism $x Political aspects. $3 870884
650 1 4 $a Economics. $3 555568
650 2 4 $a Economic Systems. $3 669238
650 2 4 $a Public Economics. $3 1069070
650 2 4 $a Political Economy. $3 1019335
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50892-4
950 $a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)