國立虎尾科技大學 |

Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims/ by C. F. Gethmann, M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, F. Thiele.
Author:	Gethmann, C. F.
other author:	Carrier, M.
Description:	XVI, 195 p. 6 illus., 4 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Philosophy and science. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
ISBN:	9783319114002

Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims
Gethmann, C. F.

Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims[electronic resource] /by C. F. Gethmann, M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, F. Thiele. - 1st ed. 2015. - XVI, 195 p. 6 illus., 4 illus. in color.online resource. - Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment,431860-4803 ;. - Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment,43.

Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.

Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.

ISBN: 9783319114002

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555818
Philosophy and science.

LC Class. No.: B67

Dewey Class. No.: 501

Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims
LDR:02678nam a22004095i 4500 001 960767
003 DE-He213
005 20200630031315.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319114002 $9 978-3-319-11400-2
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-11400-2
050 4 $a B67
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 501 $2 23
100 1 $a Gethmann, C. F. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254835
245 1 0 $a Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity Claims $h [electronic resource] / $c by C. F. Gethmann, M. Carrier, G. Hanekamp, M. Kaiser, G. Kamp, S. Lingner, M. Quante, F. Thiele.
250 $a 1st ed. 2015.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a XVI, 195 p. 6 illus., 4 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, $x 1860-4803 ; $v 43
505 0 $a Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
520 $a Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
650 0 $a Philosophy and science. $3 555818
650 0 $a Economic policy. $3 555567
650 0 $a Sociology. $3 551705
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a R & D/Technology Policy. $3 669186
650 2 4 $a Knowledge - Discourse. $3 1063331
700 1 $a Carrier, M. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254836
700 1 $a Hanekamp, G. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254837
700 1 $a Kaiser, M. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254838
700 1 $a Kamp, G. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254839
700 1 $a Lingner, S. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254840
700 1 $a Quante, M. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254841
700 1 $a Thiele, F. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1254842
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319114019
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319113999
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319363059
830 0 $a Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, $x 1860-4803 ; $v 43 $3 1254843
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
912 $a ZDB-2-ENG
912 $a ZDB-2-SXE
950 $a Engineering (SpringerNature-11647)
950 $a Engineering (R0) (SpringerNature-43712)