國立虎尾科技大學 |

Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security = Chapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security/ by Brian Rappert.
其他題名:	Chapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy /
作者:	Rappert, Brian.
面頁冊數:	online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Social sciences—Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-59261-3
ISBN:	9781137592613

Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security = Chapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy /
Rappert, Brian.

Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and SecurityChapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy /[electronic resource] :by Brian Rappert. - 1st ed. 2015. - online resource.

Open Access

Chapter 1 of this book is open access under a CC BY license. This is a chapter from Absence in Science, Security and Policy edited by Brian Rappert and Brian Balmer. This chapter is available open access under a CC BY license. Part reflection on the forthcoming chapters, part analysis of academic literature, and part programmatic agenda setting, this introduction chapter forwards the importance of questioning taken for granted assumptions in sensing what is absent as a concern. It undertakes this through initially examining what it means to characterize concern as absent or present in the first place. While absence and presence are often treated as binary opposites, it will be argued this distinction is difficult to sustain and unhelp for analysis. On the back of an appreciation of the inter-relation of absence and presence, this chapter then reviews the literature in sociology, ethics, STS and elsewhere relevant to the themes of the volume. A goal is to outline the methodological and epistemological possibilities and problematics of studying what is missing. By way of then proposing what is required, and to set the stage for the other chapters in Part 1, this chapter ends by asking how autostereograms provide a metaphor for viewing that can guide the study of absence.

ISBN: 9781137592613

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-1-137-59261-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1254447
Social sciences—Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: H61.15

Dewey Class. No.: 301.1

Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security = Chapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy /
LDR:02611nam a22003855i 4500 001 965154
003 DE-He213
005 20200918224212.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2015 xxk| s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9781137592613 $9 978-1-137-59261-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-1-137-59261-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-1-137-59261-3
050 4 $a H61.15
072 7 $a HPS $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI034000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTS $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 301.1 $2 23
100 1 $a Rappert, Brian. $e editor. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1260370
245 1 0 $a Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security $h [electronic resource] : $b Chapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy / $c by Brian Rappert.
250 $a 1st ed. 2015.
264 1 $a London : $b Palgrave Macmillan UK : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2015.
300 $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
506 0 $a Open Access
520 $a Chapter 1 of this book is open access under a CC BY license. This is a chapter from Absence in Science, Security and Policy edited by Brian Rappert and Brian Balmer. This chapter is available open access under a CC BY license. Part reflection on the forthcoming chapters, part analysis of academic literature, and part programmatic agenda setting, this introduction chapter forwards the importance of questioning taken for granted assumptions in sensing what is absent as a concern. It undertakes this through initially examining what it means to characterize concern as absent or present in the first place. While absence and presence are often treated as binary opposites, it will be argued this distinction is difficult to sustain and unhelp for analysis. On the back of an appreciation of the inter-relation of absence and presence, this chapter then reviews the literature in sociology, ethics, STS and elsewhere relevant to the themes of the volume. A goal is to outline the methodological and epistemological possibilities and problematics of studying what is missing. By way of then proposing what is required, and to set the stage for the other chapters in Part 1, this chapter ends by asking how autostereograms provide a metaphor for viewing that can guide the study of absence.
650 0 $a Social sciences—Philosophy. $3 1254447
650 1 4 $a Social Philosophy. $3 1104901
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9781349887859
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-59261-3
912 $a ZDB-2-PHC
912 $a ZDB-2-SXH
912 $a ZDB-2-SOB
950 $a Palgrave History Collection (SpringerNature-41138)
950 $a History (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)