國立虎尾科技大學 |

Risk Assessment = Origins, Evolution, and Implications for Practice /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Risk Assessment/ by David L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe.
Reminder of title:	Origins, Evolution, and Implications for Practice /
Author:	Shapiro, David L.
other author:	Noe, Angela M.
Description:	X, 61 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Psychotherapy. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9
ISBN:	9783319170589

Risk Assessment = Origins, Evolution, and Implications for Practice /
Shapiro, David L.

Risk AssessmentOrigins, Evolution, and Implications for Practice /[electronic resource] :by David L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe. - 1st ed. 2015. - X, 61 p.online resource. - SpringerBriefs in Behavioral Criminology,2194-1866. - SpringerBriefs in Behavioral Criminology,.

Chapter 1: Origins -- The MacArthur Foundation Research on Risk Assessment -- The Supposed Roles of Mental Illness -- Case Example -- Predicting Sexual Re-Offending -- Chapter 2: Assessment Instruments -- Psychopathology Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) -- Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) -- Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) -- Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG) -- Static-99 -- Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR) -- Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised (MnSOST-R) -- Structured Professional Judgement -- Historical, Clinical, Risk Management - 20 (HCR-20) -- Sexual Violence Risk - 20 (SVR-20) -- Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide (SARA) -- Observations and Limitations -- Chapter 3: Clinical Practice.- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976).- McIntosh v. Milano (1979).- Shaw v. Glickman (1980).- Thompson v. Alameda County (1979).- Hedlund v. The Superior Court of Orange County (1983).- Brady v. Hopper (1983).- Davis v. Lhim (1983).- Peck v. Counseling Services of Addison County (1985).- White v. United States (1986).- Currie v. United States (1986).- Nasser v. Parker (1995).- Sage v. United States (1997).- Jablonski v. United States (1983).- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck (1980).- Williamson v. Liptzin (2000).- Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) -- Chapter 4: Conclusions.

This compact reference makes the case for a middle ground between clinical and actuarial methods in predicting future violence, domestic violence, and sexual offending. It critiques widely used measures such as the PCL-R, VRAG, SORAG, and Static-99 in terms of clarity of scoring, need for clinical interpretation, and potential weight in assessing individuals. Appropriate standards of practice are illustrated--and questioned--based on significant legal cases, among them Tarasoff v.Regents of the State of California and Lipari v. Sears, that have long defined the field. This expert coverage helps make sense of the pertinent issues and controversies surrounding risk assessment as it provides readers with invaluable information in these and other key areas: The history of violence prediction. Commonly used assessment instruments with their strengths and limitations. Psychological risk factors, both actual and questionable. Clinical lessons learned from instructive court cases, from Tarasoff forward. Implications for treatment providers. How more specialized risk assessment measures may be developed. Risk Assessment offers its readers--professionals working with sex offenders as well as those working with the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Sex Offender Appraisal Guide--new possibilities for rethinking the assessment strategies of their trade toward predicting and preventing violent criminal incidents.

ISBN: 9783319170589

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555943
Psychotherapy.

LC Class. No.: RC475-489.2

Dewey Class. No.: 616.8914

Risk Assessment = Origins, Evolution, and Implications for Practice /
LDR:04229nam a22004215i 4500 001 969304
003 DE-He213
005 20200919062752.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319170589 $9 978-3-319-17058-9
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-17058-9
050 4 $a RC475-489.2
050 4 $a BF636.4
072 7 $a MMJT $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY028000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a MKMT $2 thema
072 7 $a MQU $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 616.8914 $2 23
100 1 $a Shapiro, David L. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1264871
245 1 0 $a Risk Assessment $h [electronic resource] : $b Origins, Evolution, and Implications for Practice / $c by David L. Shapiro, Angela M. Noe.
250 $a 1st ed. 2015.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a X, 61 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in Behavioral Criminology, $x 2194-1866
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Origins -- The MacArthur Foundation Research on Risk Assessment -- The Supposed Roles of Mental Illness -- Case Example -- Predicting Sexual Re-Offending -- Chapter 2: Assessment Instruments -- Psychopathology Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) -- Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) -- Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG) -- Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG) -- Static-99 -- Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offender Recidivism (RRASOR) -- Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised (MnSOST-R) -- Structured Professional Judgement -- Historical, Clinical, Risk Management - 20 (HCR-20) -- Sexual Violence Risk - 20 (SVR-20) -- Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide (SARA) -- Observations and Limitations -- Chapter 3: Clinical Practice.- Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976).- McIntosh v. Milano (1979).- Shaw v. Glickman (1980).- Thompson v. Alameda County (1979).- Hedlund v. The Superior Court of Orange County (1983).- Brady v. Hopper (1983).- Davis v. Lhim (1983).- Peck v. Counseling Services of Addison County (1985).- White v. United States (1986).- Currie v. United States (1986).- Nasser v. Parker (1995).- Sage v. United States (1997).- Jablonski v. United States (1983).- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck (1980).- Williamson v. Liptzin (2000).- Ewing v. Goldstein (2004) -- Chapter 4: Conclusions.
520 $a This compact reference makes the case for a middle ground between clinical and actuarial methods in predicting future violence, domestic violence, and sexual offending. It critiques widely used measures such as the PCL-R, VRAG, SORAG, and Static-99 in terms of clarity of scoring, need for clinical interpretation, and potential weight in assessing individuals. Appropriate standards of practice are illustrated--and questioned--based on significant legal cases, among them Tarasoff v.Regents of the State of California and Lipari v. Sears, that have long defined the field. This expert coverage helps make sense of the pertinent issues and controversies surrounding risk assessment as it provides readers with invaluable information in these and other key areas: The history of violence prediction. Commonly used assessment instruments with their strengths and limitations. Psychological risk factors, both actual and questionable. Clinical lessons learned from instructive court cases, from Tarasoff forward. Implications for treatment providers. How more specialized risk assessment measures may be developed. Risk Assessment offers its readers--professionals working with sex offenders as well as those working with the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and Sex Offender Appraisal Guide--new possibilities for rethinking the assessment strategies of their trade toward predicting and preventing violent criminal incidents.
650 0 $a Psychotherapy. $3 555943
650 0 $a Counseling. $3 555942
650 0 $a Criminology. $3 563146
650 1 4 $a Psychotherapy and Counseling. $3 683807
650 2 4 $a Criminology and Criminal Justice, general. $3 1112332
700 1 $a Noe, Angela M. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1264872
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319170596
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319170572
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in Behavioral Criminology, $x 2194-1866 $3 1258043
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17058-9
912 $a ZDB-2-BHS
912 $a ZDB-2-SXBP
950 $a Behavioral Science (SpringerNature-11640)
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0) (SpringerNature-43718)