國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking = A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking/ by Ana Ramalho.
其他題名:	A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization /
作者:	Ramalho, Ana.
面頁冊數:	XI, 249 p. 3 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Mass media. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28206-0
ISBN:	9783319282060

The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking = A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization /
Ramalho, Ana.

The Competence of the European Union in Copyright LawmakingA Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization /[electronic resource] :by Ana Ramalho. - 1st ed. 2016. - XI, 249 p. 3 illus.online resource.

1. Introduction -- 2. A Normative Gap in Copyright Lawmaking? -- 3. Colonizing the Normative Gap: The Intervention of the Court of Justice -- 4. Minding the Normative Gap: The EU Treaties -- 5. Bridging the Normative Gap: Proposed Benchmarks for Copyright Lawmaking -- 6. Field-Testing the Normative Bridge: The EU Copyright Acquis -- 7. The Normative Gap: Water Under the Bridge.

This book inquires into the competence of the EU to legislate in the field of copyright, and uses content analysis techniques to demonstrate the existence of a normative gap in copyright lawmaking. To address that gap, it proposes the creation of benchmarks of legislative activity, reasoning that EU secondary legislation, such as directives and regulations, should be based on higher sources of law. It investigates two such possible sources: the activity of the EU Court of Justice in the pre-legislative era and the EU treaties. From these sources, the author establishes concrete benchmarks of legislative activity, which she then tests by applying them to current EU copyright legislation. This provides examples of good and bad practices in copyright lawmaking and also shows how the benchmarks could be implemented in copyright legislation. Finally, the author offers some recommendations in this regard.

ISBN: 9783319282060

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-28206-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

556421
Mass media.

LC Class. No.: K4240-4343

Dewey Class. No.: 343.099

The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking = A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization /
LDR:02690nam a22003975i 4500 001 974247
003 DE-He213
005 20200704092619.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319282060 $9 978-3-319-28206-0
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-28206-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-28206-0
050 4 $a K4240-4343
072 7 $a LNJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LNJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 343.099 $2 23
100 1 $a Ramalho, Ana. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1107025
245 1 4 $a The Competence of the European Union in Copyright Lawmaking $h [electronic resource] : $b A Normative Perspective of EU Powers for Copyright Harmonization / $c by Ana Ramalho.
250 $a 1st ed. 2016.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a XI, 249 p. 3 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. A Normative Gap in Copyright Lawmaking? -- 3. Colonizing the Normative Gap: The Intervention of the Court of Justice -- 4. Minding the Normative Gap: The EU Treaties -- 5. Bridging the Normative Gap: Proposed Benchmarks for Copyright Lawmaking -- 6. Field-Testing the Normative Bridge: The EU Copyright Acquis -- 7. The Normative Gap: Water Under the Bridge.
520 $a This book inquires into the competence of the EU to legislate in the field of copyright, and uses content analysis techniques to demonstrate the existence of a normative gap in copyright lawmaking. To address that gap, it proposes the creation of benchmarks of legislative activity, reasoning that EU secondary legislation, such as directives and regulations, should be based on higher sources of law. It investigates two such possible sources: the activity of the EU Court of Justice in the pre-legislative era and the EU treaties. From these sources, the author establishes concrete benchmarks of legislative activity, which she then tests by applying them to current EU copyright legislation. This provides examples of good and bad practices in copyright lawmaking and also shows how the benchmarks could be implemented in copyright legislation. Finally, the author offers some recommendations in this regard.
650 0 $a Mass media. $3 556421
650 0 $a Law. $3 671705
650 0 $a Law—Europe. $3 1254279
650 0 $a European Economic Community literature. $3 1142411
650 0 $a European Union. $3 556602
650 1 4 $a IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property. $3 1209939
650 2 4 $a European Law. $3 883672
650 2 4 $a European Integration. $3 669179
650 2 4 $a European Union Politics. $3 1104958
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319282053
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319282077
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319802978
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28206-0
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)