國立虎尾科技大學 |

Marion and Derrida on The Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Marion and Derrida on The Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things/ by Jason Alvis.
作者:	Alvis, Jason.
面頁冊數:	XI, 269 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Phenomenology . -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27942-8
ISBN:	9783319279428

Marion and Derrida on The Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things
Alvis, Jason.

Marion and Derrida on The Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things[electronic resource] /by Jason Alvis. - 1st ed. 2016. - XI, 269 p.online resource. - Contributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology,850923-9545 ;. - Contributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology,73.

1. Introduction: Histories of the Gift and Desire -- Part 1. Marion, the Gift, and Desire -- 2. Marion’s The Adonné Or “The Given:” between Passion and Passivity -- 3. The Manifolds of Desire and Love in Marion’s The Erotic Phenomenon -- 4. Marion on Love and Givenness: Desiring to Give What One Lacks -- Part 2. Derrida, Desire, and the Gift -- 5. Indifference: Derrida beyond Husserl, Intentionality, and Desire -- 6. Desire in Derrida’s Given Time: There is (Es gibt) No Gift Outside the Text -- 7. The Gift in Derrida’s Deconstruction: Affirming the Gift through Denegation -- Part 3. Before Marion’s Phenomenology, After Derrida’s Deconstruction -- 8. Four Tensions between Marion and Derrida: Close yet Extremely Distant -- 9. Conclusion: The Generosity of Things: Between Phenomenology and Deconstruction.

This book examines the various encounters between Jean-Luc Marion and Jacques Derrida on “the gift,” considers their many differences on “desire,” and demonstrates how these topics hold the keys to some of phenomenology’s most pressing structural questions, especially regarding “deconstructive” approaches within the field. The book claims that the topic of desire is a central lynchpin to understanding the two thinkers’ conflict over the gift, for the gift is reducible to the “desire to give,” which initiates a turn to the topic of “generosity.” To what degree might loving also imply giving? How far might it be suggested that love is reducible to desire and intentionality? It is demonstrated how Derrida (the generative “father” of deconstruction) rejects the possibility of any potential relation between the gift and desire on the account that desire is bound to calculative repetition, economical appropriation, and subject-centered interests that hinder deconstruction. Whereas Marion (a representative of the phenomenological tradition) demands a unique union between the gift and desire, which are both represented in his “reduction to givenness” and “erotic reduction.” The book is the first extensive attempt to contextualize the stark differences between Marion and Derrida within the phenomenological legacy (Husserl, Heidegger, Kant), supplies readers with in-depth accounts of the topics of the gift, love, and desire, and demonstrates another means through which the appearing of phenomena might be understood, namely, according to the generosity of things.

ISBN: 9783319279428

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-27942-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1253735
Phenomenology .

LC Class. No.: B829.5.A-829.5.Z

Dewey Class. No.: 142.7

Marion and Derrida on The Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things
LDR:03934nam a22004095i 4500 001 974904
003 DE-He213
005 20200704005316.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319279428 $9 978-3-319-27942-8
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-27942-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-27942-8
050 4 $a B829.5.A-829.5.Z
072 7 $a HPCF3 $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI018000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDHR5 $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 142.7 $2 23
100 1 $a Alvis, Jason. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1269566
245 1 0 $a Marion and Derrida on The Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things $h [electronic resource] / $c by Jason Alvis.
250 $a 1st ed. 2016.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a XI, 269 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Contributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, $x 0923-9545 ; $v 85
505 0 $a 1. Introduction: Histories of the Gift and Desire -- Part 1. Marion, the Gift, and Desire -- 2. Marion’s The Adonné Or “The Given:” between Passion and Passivity -- 3. The Manifolds of Desire and Love in Marion’s The Erotic Phenomenon -- 4. Marion on Love and Givenness: Desiring to Give What One Lacks -- Part 2. Derrida, Desire, and the Gift -- 5. Indifference: Derrida beyond Husserl, Intentionality, and Desire -- 6. Desire in Derrida’s Given Time: There is (Es gibt) No Gift Outside the Text -- 7. The Gift in Derrida’s Deconstruction: Affirming the Gift through Denegation -- Part 3. Before Marion’s Phenomenology, After Derrida’s Deconstruction -- 8. Four Tensions between Marion and Derrida: Close yet Extremely Distant -- 9. Conclusion: The Generosity of Things: Between Phenomenology and Deconstruction.
520 $a This book examines the various encounters between Jean-Luc Marion and Jacques Derrida on “the gift,” considers their many differences on “desire,” and demonstrates how these topics hold the keys to some of phenomenology’s most pressing structural questions, especially regarding “deconstructive” approaches within the field. The book claims that the topic of desire is a central lynchpin to understanding the two thinkers’ conflict over the gift, for the gift is reducible to the “desire to give,” which initiates a turn to the topic of “generosity.” To what degree might loving also imply giving? How far might it be suggested that love is reducible to desire and intentionality? It is demonstrated how Derrida (the generative “father” of deconstruction) rejects the possibility of any potential relation between the gift and desire on the account that desire is bound to calculative repetition, economical appropriation, and subject-centered interests that hinder deconstruction. Whereas Marion (a representative of the phenomenological tradition) demands a unique union between the gift and desire, which are both represented in his “reduction to givenness” and “erotic reduction.” The book is the first extensive attempt to contextualize the stark differences between Marion and Derrida within the phenomenological legacy (Husserl, Heidegger, Kant), supplies readers with in-depth accounts of the topics of the gift, love, and desire, and demonstrates another means through which the appearing of phenomena might be understood, namely, according to the generosity of things.
650 0 $a Phenomenology . $3 1253735
650 0 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 1 4 $a Phenomenology. $3 555526
650 2 4 $a History of Philosophy. $3 671574
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319279404
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319279411
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319802435
830 0 $a Contributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, $x 0923-9545 ; $v 73 $3 1253734
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27942-8
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)