國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights = Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights/ by Alfredo Narváez Medécigo.
其他題名:	Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /
作者:	Narváez Medécigo, Alfredo.
面頁冊數:	XV, 262 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Private international law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1
ISBN:	9783319245621

Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights = Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /
Narváez Medécigo, Alfredo.

Rule of Law and Fundamental RightsCritical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /[electronic resource] :by Alfredo Narváez Medécigo. - 1st ed. 2016. - XV, 262 p.online resource.

1. General Introduction -- 2. Rule-of-law and Judicial Federalism: The Role of Ordinary Courts in the Enforcement of Constitutional Rights -- 3. Constitutional Review in the United States of America: Does “Diffused” mean Complete Decentralization? -- 4. The German System of Constitutional Review: Prototype of a Concentrated Model? -- 5. Constitutional Review in Mexico: A Best of All Worlds Solution? -- 6. General Conclusions.

This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review ― and thus the ‘law’ as such ― and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction. .

ISBN: 9783319245621

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1202562
Private international law.

LC Class. No.: K7000-7720.22

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights = Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /
LDR:02966nam a22004335i 4500 001 978856
003 DE-He213
005 20200705134508.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319245621 $9 978-3-319-24562-1
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-24562-1
050 4 $a K7000-7720.22
050 4 $a K7073-7078
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 340.2 $2 23
100 1 $a Narváez Medécigo, Alfredo. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1272134
245 1 0 $a Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights $h [electronic resource] : $b Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico / $c by Alfredo Narváez Medécigo.
250 $a 1st ed. 2016.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a XV, 262 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a 1. General Introduction -- 2. Rule-of-law and Judicial Federalism: The Role of Ordinary Courts in the Enforcement of Constitutional Rights -- 3. Constitutional Review in the United States of America: Does “Diffused” mean Complete Decentralization? -- 4. The German System of Constitutional Review: Prototype of a Concentrated Model? -- 5. Constitutional Review in Mexico: A Best of All Worlds Solution? -- 6. General Conclusions.
520 $a This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review ― and thus the ‘law’ as such ― and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction. .
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a Law—Philosophy. $3 1253604
650 0 $a Law. $3 671705
650 0 $a Constitutional law. $3 564349
650 0 $a Comparative politics. $2 bicssc $3 937867
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . $3 1209897
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 671565
650 2 4 $a Comparative Politics. $3 884817
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319245614
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319245638
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319387185
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)