國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rational Lawmaking under Review = Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rational Lawmaking under Review/ edited by Klaus Meßerschmidt, A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana.
其他題名:	Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court /
其他作者:	Meßerschmidt, Klaus.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 412 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Law—Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8
ISBN:	9783319332178

Rational Lawmaking under Review = Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court /
Rational Lawmaking under ReviewLegisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court /[electronic resource] :edited by Klaus Meßerschmidt, A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana. - 1st ed. 2016. - VIII, 412 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation,32213-2813 ;. - Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation,2.

Foreword; Luc J. Wintgens -- 1 On the “Legisprudential Turn” in Judicial Review: An Introduction; A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana and Klaus Meßerschmidt -- Part I. Judicial Review, Democracy, and Legislation Theory -- 2 Constitutional Courts and Democracy. Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship; Gertrude Lübe-Wolff -- 3 Paths towards Better Legislation, Detours and Dead-ends: An Appraisal of Consultation with Independent Experts, Justifications for Legislation, Impact Assessments and Controls of Efficacy; Helmuth Schulze-FielitzPart -- II. Judicial Review of Legislative Rationality and Justification -- 4 Rationality Requirements on Parliamentary Legislation under a Democratic Rule of Law; Bernd Grzeszick -- 5 The Generality of the Law. The Law as a Necessary Guarantor of Freedom, Equality and Democracy, and the Differentiated Role of the Federal Constitutional Court as a Watchdog; Gregor Kirchhof -- 6 On Constitutional Duties to Give Reasons for Legislative Acts; Christian Waldhoff -- Part III. Judicial Review of Legislative Consistency and Systematicity -- 7 The Obligation of Consistency in Lawmaking. Using the Example of the Ban on the Private Sale of Public Lottery Tickets and its Review by the Federal Constitutional Court; Christian Bumke -- Inconsistent Legislation; Matthias Rossi -- 9 Judicial Review of Tax Laws: The Coherence Requirement; Roland Ismer -- Part IV. Judicial Review of Legislative Facts and Impacts -- 10 Legislative Margins of Appreciation as the Result of Rational Lawmaking; Christian Bickenbach -- 11 Due Post-Legislative Process? On the Lawmakers’ Constitutional Duties of Monitoring and Revision; A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana -- 12 Efficacy, Effectiveness, Efficiency – From Judicial to Managerial Rationality; Ulrich Karpen -- 13 Symbolic Legislation under Judicial Control; Angelika Siehr -- Part V. Legislative Balancing, Proportionality, and Process Review -- 14 Rational Lawmaking, Proportionality and Balancing; Jan Sieckmann -- 15 The Procedural Review of Legislation and the Substantive Review of Legislation – Opponents or Allies?; Klaus Meßerschmidt -- Index -- About the Authors.

This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court´s approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers’ duty to legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on ‘legisprudence under review’, this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.

ISBN: 9783319332178

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1253604
Law—Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: K201-487

Dewey Class. No.: 340.1

Rational Lawmaking under Review = Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court /
LDR:05645nam a22004215i 4500 001 979843
003 DE-He213
005 20200704074544.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319332178 $9 978-3-319-33217-8
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-33217-8
050 4 $a K201-487
050 4 $a B65
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW079000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.1 $2 23
245 1 0 $a Rational Lawmaking under Review $h [electronic resource] : $b Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court / $c edited by Klaus Meßerschmidt, A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana.
250 $a 1st ed. 2016.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a VIII, 412 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation, $x 2213-2813 ; $v 3
505 0 $a Foreword; Luc J. Wintgens -- 1 On the “Legisprudential Turn” in Judicial Review: An Introduction; A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana and Klaus Meßerschmidt -- Part I. Judicial Review, Democracy, and Legislation Theory -- 2 Constitutional Courts and Democracy. Facets of an Ambivalent Relationship; Gertrude Lübe-Wolff -- 3 Paths towards Better Legislation, Detours and Dead-ends: An Appraisal of Consultation with Independent Experts, Justifications for Legislation, Impact Assessments and Controls of Efficacy; Helmuth Schulze-FielitzPart -- II. Judicial Review of Legislative Rationality and Justification -- 4 Rationality Requirements on Parliamentary Legislation under a Democratic Rule of Law; Bernd Grzeszick -- 5 The Generality of the Law. The Law as a Necessary Guarantor of Freedom, Equality and Democracy, and the Differentiated Role of the Federal Constitutional Court as a Watchdog; Gregor Kirchhof -- 6 On Constitutional Duties to Give Reasons for Legislative Acts; Christian Waldhoff -- Part III. Judicial Review of Legislative Consistency and Systematicity -- 7 The Obligation of Consistency in Lawmaking. Using the Example of the Ban on the Private Sale of Public Lottery Tickets and its Review by the Federal Constitutional Court; Christian Bumke -- Inconsistent Legislation; Matthias Rossi -- 9 Judicial Review of Tax Laws: The Coherence Requirement; Roland Ismer -- Part IV. Judicial Review of Legislative Facts and Impacts -- 10 Legislative Margins of Appreciation as the Result of Rational Lawmaking; Christian Bickenbach -- 11 Due Post-Legislative Process? On the Lawmakers’ Constitutional Duties of Monitoring and Revision; A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana -- 12 Efficacy, Effectiveness, Efficiency – From Judicial to Managerial Rationality; Ulrich Karpen -- 13 Symbolic Legislation under Judicial Control; Angelika Siehr -- Part V. Legislative Balancing, Proportionality, and Process Review -- 14 Rational Lawmaking, Proportionality and Balancing; Jan Sieckmann -- 15 The Procedural Review of Legislation and the Substantive Review of Legislation – Opponents or Allies?; Klaus Meßerschmidt -- Index -- About the Authors.
520 $a This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court´s approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers’ duty to legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on ‘legisprudence under review’, this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.
650 0 $a Law—Philosophy. $3 1253604
650 0 $a Law. $3 671705
650 0 $a Political theory. $3 1253540
650 0 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 0 $a Constitutional law. $3 564349
650 1 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
650 2 4 $a Political Theory. $3 890169
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 671683
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 671565
700 1 $a Meßerschmidt, Klaus. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1272826
700 1 $a Oliver-Lalana, A. Daniel. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1077175
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319332154
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319332161
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319814575
830 0 $a Legisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation, $x 2213-2813 ; $v 2 $3 1261885
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)