語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play =...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play = Cardenio/Double Falsehood in the Eighteenth Century /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play/ edited by Deborah C. Payne.
其他題名:
Cardenio/Double Falsehood in the Eighteenth Century /
其他作者:
Payne, Deborah C.
面頁冊數:
XI, 138 p.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Literature, Modern. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2
ISBN:
9783319465142
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play = Cardenio/Double Falsehood in the Eighteenth Century /
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play
Cardenio/Double Falsehood in the Eighteenth Century /[electronic resource] :edited by Deborah C. Payne. - 1st ed. 2016. - XI, 138 p.online resource.
Introduction; Fiona Ritchie -- Believers versus Skeptics: An Assessment of the Cardenio/Double Falsehood Problem; Robert D. Hume -- The Jolt of Jacobean Tragicomedy: Double Falsehood on the Eighteenth-Century English Stage; Diana Solomon -- Ghostwriting: Lewis Theobald’s Double Falsehood as Adaptation; Jean I. Marsden -- Textual Skirmishes and Theatrical Frays: Putting Double Falsehood Back in the Eighteenth Century; Deborah C. Payne -- Bibliography -- Index.
'This uniformly excellent collection does what none of the other recent scholarship on Double Falsehood or Cardenio does: it approaches the complex problems of authorship, performance, form and gender politics from the perspective of Restoration and eighteenth-century theatre. Anyone seriously interested in the Jacobean play, its Georgian adaptation, or in English drama from 1660 to 1740 should read this book.' - Gary Taylor, General Editor, The New Oxford Shakespeare This collection of essays centres on Double Falsehood, Lewis Theobald’s 1727 adaptation of the “lost” play of Cardenio, possibly co-authored by John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. In a departure from most scholarship to date, the contributors fold Double Falsehood back into the milieu for which it was created rather than searching for traces of Shakespeare in the text. Robert D. Hume’s knowledge of theatre history permits a fresh take on the forgery question as well as the Shakespeare authorship controversy. Diana Solomon’s understanding of eighteenth-century rape culture and Jean I. Marsden’s command of contemporary adaptation practices both emphasise the play’s immediate social and theatrical contexts. And, finally, Deborah C. Payne’s familiarity with the eighteenth-century stage allows for a reconsideration of Double Falsehood as integral to a debate between Theobald, Alexander Pope, and John Gay over the future of the English drama. Deborah C. Payne is an Associate Professor of Literature at American University. She specializes in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century drama, theatre history, and performance theory. Her publications include Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theatre, co-edited with J. Douglas Canfield; The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre; and Four Restoration Libertine Plays. Recently she completed The Commodiluxe Stage: A New History of Restoration Theatre, 1660-1700.
ISBN: 9783319465142
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
685063
Literature, Modern.
LC Class. No.: PN715-749
Dewey Class. No.: 809
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play = Cardenio/Double Falsehood in the Eighteenth Century /
LDR
:03821nam a22003975i 4500
001
980064
003
DE-He213
005
20200704170602.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783319465142
$9
978-3-319-46514-2
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-46514-2
050
4
$a
PN715-749
072
7
$a
DSB
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LIT024000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
DSB
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
809
$2
23
245
1 0
$a
Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
Cardenio/Double Falsehood in the Eighteenth Century /
$c
edited by Deborah C. Payne.
250
$a
1st ed. 2016.
264
1
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
$c
2016.
300
$a
XI, 138 p.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
505
0
$a
Introduction; Fiona Ritchie -- Believers versus Skeptics: An Assessment of the Cardenio/Double Falsehood Problem; Robert D. Hume -- The Jolt of Jacobean Tragicomedy: Double Falsehood on the Eighteenth-Century English Stage; Diana Solomon -- Ghostwriting: Lewis Theobald’s Double Falsehood as Adaptation; Jean I. Marsden -- Textual Skirmishes and Theatrical Frays: Putting Double Falsehood Back in the Eighteenth Century; Deborah C. Payne -- Bibliography -- Index.
520
$a
'This uniformly excellent collection does what none of the other recent scholarship on Double Falsehood or Cardenio does: it approaches the complex problems of authorship, performance, form and gender politics from the perspective of Restoration and eighteenth-century theatre. Anyone seriously interested in the Jacobean play, its Georgian adaptation, or in English drama from 1660 to 1740 should read this book.' - Gary Taylor, General Editor, The New Oxford Shakespeare This collection of essays centres on Double Falsehood, Lewis Theobald’s 1727 adaptation of the “lost” play of Cardenio, possibly co-authored by John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. In a departure from most scholarship to date, the contributors fold Double Falsehood back into the milieu for which it was created rather than searching for traces of Shakespeare in the text. Robert D. Hume’s knowledge of theatre history permits a fresh take on the forgery question as well as the Shakespeare authorship controversy. Diana Solomon’s understanding of eighteenth-century rape culture and Jean I. Marsden’s command of contemporary adaptation practices both emphasise the play’s immediate social and theatrical contexts. And, finally, Deborah C. Payne’s familiarity with the eighteenth-century stage allows for a reconsideration of Double Falsehood as integral to a debate between Theobald, Alexander Pope, and John Gay over the future of the English drama. Deborah C. Payne is an Associate Professor of Literature at American University. She specializes in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century drama, theatre history, and performance theory. Her publications include Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theatre, co-edited with J. Douglas Canfield; The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre; and Four Restoration Libertine Plays. Recently she completed The Commodiluxe Stage: A New History of Restoration Theatre, 1660-1700.
650
0
$a
Literature, Modern.
$3
685063
650
0
$a
Literature, Modern—18th century.
$3
1254161
650
0
$a
Theater—History.
$3
1253996
650
1 4
$a
Early Modern/Renaissance Literature.
$3
1105003
650
2 4
$a
Eighteenth-Century Literature.
$3
1104875
650
2 4
$a
Theatre History.
$3
1104912
700
1
$a
Payne, Deborah C.
$4
edt
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
$3
1117491
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783319465135
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783319465159
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783319835334
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2
912
$a
ZDB-2-LCM
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXL
950
$a
Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (SpringerNature-41173)
950
$a
Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43723)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入