國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis = Reasoning about Uncertainty /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis/ edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn.
Reminder of title:	Reasoning about Uncertainty /
other author:	Hansson, Sven Ove.
Description:	XII, 353 p. 13 illus., 6 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Philosophy and science. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3
ISBN:	9783319305493

The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis = Reasoning about Uncertainty /
The Argumentative Turn in Policy AnalysisReasoning about Uncertainty /[electronic resource] :edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn. - 1st ed. 2016. - XII, 353 p. 13 illus., 6 illus. in color.online resource. - Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,102214-9120 ;. - Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences,7.

Introduction -- Summary; Sven Ove Hansson and Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn -- The argumentative turn; Sven Ove Hansson and Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn -- Part I. Argumentative strategies -- Choosing among the uncertainties; Sven Ove Hansson -- Accounting for possibilities; Gregor Betz -- Framing; Till Grüne-Yanoff -- Timing strategies; Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn -- Setting and revising goals; Karin Edvardsson Björnberg -- Value uncertainty; Niklas Möller -- Ethical orientations for policy decisions; Rafaela Hillerbrand, Pieter van Gelder, and Genserik Reniers -- Participation as a means to better argumentation; Jeroen van den Hoven, Alessandra Palmigiano, and Francis M Brazier -- Argumentative roads to agreement; Georg Brun and Gregor Betz -- Part II Argumentation in practice -- Climate geoengineering; Kevin Elliott -- Water governance; Neelke Doorn -- Synthetic biology; Armin Grunwald -- Nuclear waste; Kristin Shrader-Frechette -- Financial markets; Michael Schefczyk.

This book describes argumentative tools and strategies that can be used to guide policy decisions under conditions of great uncertainty. Contributing authors explore methods from philosophical analysis and in particular argumentation analysis, showing how it can be used to systematize discussions about policy issues involving great uncertainty. The first part of the work explores how to deal in a systematic way with decision-making when there may be plural perspectives on the decision problem, along with unknown consequences of what we do. Readers will see how argumentation tools can be used for prioritizing among uncertain dangers, for determining how decisions should be framed, for choosing a suitable time frame for a decision, and for systematically choosing among different decision options. Case studies are presented in the second part of the book, showing argumentation in practice in the areas of climate geoengineering, water governance, synthetic biology, nuclear waste, and financial markets. In one example, argumentation analysis is applied to proposals to solve the climate problem with various technological manipulations of the natural climate system, such as massive dispersion of reflective aerosols into the stratosphere. Even after a thorough investigation of such a proposal, doubt remains as to whether all the potential risks have been identified. In such discussions, conventional risk analysis does not have much to contribute since it presupposes that the risks have been identified, whereas the argumentative approach to uncertainty management can be used to systematize discussions.

ISBN: 9783319305493

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555818
Philosophy and science.

LC Class. No.: B67

Dewey Class. No.: 501

The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis = Reasoning about Uncertainty /
LDR:04128nam a22004095i 4500 001 982340
003 DE-He213
005 20200706074600.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319305493 $9 978-3-319-30549-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-30549-3
050 4 $a B67
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 501 $2 23
245 1 4 $a The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis $h [electronic resource] : $b Reasoning about Uncertainty / $c edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn.
250 $a 1st ed. 2016.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a XII, 353 p. 13 illus., 6 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, $x 2214-9120 ; $v 10
505 0 $a Introduction -- Summary; Sven Ove Hansson and Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn -- The argumentative turn; Sven Ove Hansson and Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn -- Part I. Argumentative strategies -- Choosing among the uncertainties; Sven Ove Hansson -- Accounting for possibilities; Gregor Betz -- Framing; Till Grüne-Yanoff -- Timing strategies; Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn -- Setting and revising goals; Karin Edvardsson Björnberg -- Value uncertainty; Niklas Möller -- Ethical orientations for policy decisions; Rafaela Hillerbrand, Pieter van Gelder, and Genserik Reniers -- Participation as a means to better argumentation; Jeroen van den Hoven, Alessandra Palmigiano, and Francis M Brazier -- Argumentative roads to agreement; Georg Brun and Gregor Betz -- Part II Argumentation in practice -- Climate geoengineering; Kevin Elliott -- Water governance; Neelke Doorn -- Synthetic biology; Armin Grunwald -- Nuclear waste; Kristin Shrader-Frechette -- Financial markets; Michael Schefczyk.
520 $a This book describes argumentative tools and strategies that can be used to guide policy decisions under conditions of great uncertainty. Contributing authors explore methods from philosophical analysis and in particular argumentation analysis, showing how it can be used to systematize discussions about policy issues involving great uncertainty. The first part of the work explores how to deal in a systematic way with decision-making when there may be plural perspectives on the decision problem, along with unknown consequences of what we do. Readers will see how argumentation tools can be used for prioritizing among uncertain dangers, for determining how decisions should be framed, for choosing a suitable time frame for a decision, and for systematically choosing among different decision options. Case studies are presented in the second part of the book, showing argumentation in practice in the areas of climate geoengineering, water governance, synthetic biology, nuclear waste, and financial markets. In one example, argumentation analysis is applied to proposals to solve the climate problem with various technological manipulations of the natural climate system, such as massive dispersion of reflective aerosols into the stratosphere. Even after a thorough investigation of such a proposal, doubt remains as to whether all the potential risks have been identified. In such discussions, conventional risk analysis does not have much to contribute since it presupposes that the risks have been identified, whereas the argumentative approach to uncertainty management can be used to systematize discussions.
650 0 $a Philosophy and science. $3 555818
650 0 $a Social policy. $3 555261
650 0 $a Game theory. $3 556918
650 0 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a Social Policy. $3 669212
650 2 4 $a Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences. $3 669497
700 1 $a Hansson, Sven Ove. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1023253
700 1 $a Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1109662
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319305479
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319305486
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319808369
830 0 $a Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences, $x 2214-9120 ; $v 7 $3 1258789
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)