國立虎尾科技大學 |

How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning/ edited by Mátyás Bencze, Gar Yein Ng.
其他作者:	Bencze, Mátyás.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 268 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Private international law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6
ISBN:	9783319973166

How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning
How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning[electronic resource] /edited by Mátyás Bencze, Gar Yein Ng. - 1st ed. 2018. - VIII, 268 p.online resource. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,691534-6781 ;. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,42.

Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities – Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.

This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book.

ISBN: 9783319973166

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1202562
Private international law.

LC Class. No.: K7000-7720.22

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning
LDR:04115nam a22004455i 4500 001 986573
003 DE-He213
005 20200706053154.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319973166 $9 978-3-319-97316-6
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-97316-6
050 4 $a K7000-7720.22
050 4 $a K7073-7078
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 340.2 $2 23
245 1 0 $a How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Mátyás Bencze, Gar Yein Ng.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a VIII, 268 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v 69
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities – Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.
520 $a This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book.
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a Law—Philosophy. $3 1253604
650 0 $a Law. $3 671705
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . $3 1209897
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
700 1 $a Bencze, Mátyás. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1279088
700 1 $a Ng, Gar Yein. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1208611
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319973159
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319973173
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030073336
830 0 $a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v 42 $3 1253974
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)