國立虎尾科技大學 |

An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism = Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism/ by John Wright.
其他題名:	Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation /
作者:	Wright, John.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 220 p. 16 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Philosophy and science. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1
ISBN:	9783030022181

An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism = Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation /
Wright, John.

An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific RealismDefending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation /[electronic resource] :by John Wright. - 1st ed. 2018. - VIII, 220 p. 16 illus.online resource. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,4020166-6991 ;. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,359.

Chapter 1. Introduction: Realism and Reason -- Chapter 2. The Skeptical Arguments Against Realism– 1: Inductive Skepticism -- Chapter 3. The Skeptical Arguments – 2: The Pessimistic Meta-Induction -- Chapter 4. Realism and Inference to the Best Explanation -- Chapter 5. On the Inference to Unobservables -- Chapter 6. Underdetermination and Theory Preference -- Chapter 7. Eddington Inferences in Science – 1: Atoms and Molecules -- Chapter 8. Eddington Inferences in Science – 2: The Size and Shape of the Universe -- Bibliography.

This monograph develops a new way of justifying the claims made by science about phenomenon not directly observable by humans, such as atoms and black holes. It details a way of making inferences to the existence and properties of unobservable entities and states of affairs that can be given a probabilistic justification. The inferences used to establish realist claims are not a form of, and neither do they rely on, inference to the best explanation. Scientific Realism maintains that scientific theories and hypotheses refer to real entities, forces, and relations, even if one cannot examine them. But, there are those who doubt these claims. The author develops a novel way of defending Scientific Realism against a range of influential attacks. He argues that in some cases, at least, we can make probabilistically justifiable inferences from observed data to claims about unobservable, theoretical entities. He shows how this enables us to place some scientific realist claims on a firmer epistemological footing than has previously been the case. This also makes it possible to give a unified set of replies to the most common objections to Scientific Realism. The final chapters apply the developed conceptual apparatus to key cases from the history of science and from recent science. One example concerns realism with respect to atoms. Another looks at inferences from recent astronomical data to conclusions about the size and shape of those parts of the universe lying beyond that which we can observe.

ISBN: 9783030022181

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555818
Philosophy and science.

LC Class. No.: B67

Dewey Class. No.: 501

An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism = Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation /
LDR:03515nam a22003975i 4500 001 987824
003 DE-He213
005 20200813150558.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030022181 $9 978-3-030-02218-1
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-02218-1
050 4 $a B67
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 501 $2 23
100 1 $a Wright, John. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 908089
245 1 3 $a An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism $h [electronic resource] : $b Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation / $c by John Wright.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a VIII, 220 p. 16 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 402
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction: Realism and Reason -- Chapter 2. The Skeptical Arguments Against Realism– 1: Inductive Skepticism -- Chapter 3. The Skeptical Arguments – 2: The Pessimistic Meta-Induction -- Chapter 4. Realism and Inference to the Best Explanation -- Chapter 5. On the Inference to Unobservables -- Chapter 6. Underdetermination and Theory Preference -- Chapter 7. Eddington Inferences in Science – 1: Atoms and Molecules -- Chapter 8. Eddington Inferences in Science – 2: The Size and Shape of the Universe -- Bibliography.
520 $a This monograph develops a new way of justifying the claims made by science about phenomenon not directly observable by humans, such as atoms and black holes. It details a way of making inferences to the existence and properties of unobservable entities and states of affairs that can be given a probabilistic justification. The inferences used to establish realist claims are not a form of, and neither do they rely on, inference to the best explanation. Scientific Realism maintains that scientific theories and hypotheses refer to real entities, forces, and relations, even if one cannot examine them. But, there are those who doubt these claims. The author develops a novel way of defending Scientific Realism against a range of influential attacks. He argues that in some cases, at least, we can make probabilistically justifiable inferences from observed data to claims about unobservable, theoretical entities. He shows how this enables us to place some scientific realist claims on a firmer epistemological footing than has previously been the case. This also makes it possible to give a unified set of replies to the most common objections to Scientific Realism. The final chapters apply the developed conceptual apparatus to key cases from the history of science and from recent science. One example concerns realism with respect to atoms. Another looks at inferences from recent astronomical data to conclusions about the size and shape of those parts of the universe lying beyond that which we can observe.
650 0 $a Philosophy and science. $3 555818
650 0 $a Mathematical physics. $3 527831
650 0 $a Chemistry, Physical and theoretical. $3 557299
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics. $3 768900
650 2 4 $a Theoretical and Computational Chemistry. $3 670313
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030022174
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030022198
830 0 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 359 $3 1257256
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)