國立虎尾科技大學 |

A Biosemiotic Ontology = The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Biosemiotic Ontology / by Felice Cimatti.
其他題名:	The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi /
作者:	Cimatti, Felice.
面頁冊數:	V, 159 p. 20 illus., 6 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Semiotics. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8
ISBN:	9783319979038

A Biosemiotic Ontology = The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi /
Cimatti, Felice.

A Biosemiotic Ontology The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi /[electronic resource] :by Felice Cimatti. - 1st ed. 2018. - V, 159 p. 20 illus., 6 illus. in color.online resource. - Biosemiotics,181875-4651 ;. - Biosemiotics,13.

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Life -- Chapter 3. Scientist because Philosopher, Philosopher because Scientist -- Chapter 4. The Line and the Circle -- Chapter 5. The Biological Model: for an anti-Cartesian semiotics -- Chapter 6. Of the Complementarity of the Sign -- Chapter 7. The Origin of Language -- Chapter 8. Attention and Consciousness -- Chapter 9. Breaking the Circle -- Chapter 10. Language and Ethics -- Chapter 11. The “Darkness” Between Aesthetics and the Sacred -- Chapter 12. Conclusion: Prodi and Italian Thought.

Giorgio Prodi (1928-1987) was an important Italian scientist who developed an original philosophy based on two basic assumptions: 1. life is mainly a semiotic phenomenon; 2. matter is somewhat a semiotic phenomenon. Prodi applies Peirce's cenopythagorean categories to all phenomena of life and matter: Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. They are interconnected meaning that the very ontology of the world, according to Prodi, is somewhat semiotic. In fact, when one describes matter as “made of” Firstness and Secondness, this means that matter ‘intrinsically’ implies semiotics (with Thirdness also being present in the world). At the very heart of Prodi’s theory lies a metaphysical hypothesis which is an ambitious theoretical gesture that places Prodi in an awkward position with respect to the customary philosophical tradition. In fact, his own ontology is neither dualistic nor monistic. Such a conclusion is unusual and weird, but much less unusual in present time than it was when it was first introduced. The actual resurgence of various “realisms” make Prodi’s semiotic realism much more interesting than when he first proposed his philosophical approach. What is uncommon, in Prodi perspective, is that he never separated semiotics from the materiality of the world. Prodi does not agree with the “standard” structuralist view of semiosis as an artificial and unnatural activity. On the contrary, Prodi believed semiosis (that is, the interconnection between Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness) lies at the very bottom of life. On one hand, Prodi maintains a strong realist stance; on the other, a realism that includes semiosis as ‘natural’ phenomena. This last view is very unusual because all forms, more or less, of realism exclude semiosis from nature but they frequently “reduce” semiosis to non-semiotic elements. According to Prodi, semiosis is a completely natural phenomenon.

ISBN: 9783319979038

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

559892
Semiotics.

LC Class. No.: P99-P99.4

Dewey Class. No.: 401.4

A Biosemiotic Ontology = The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi /
LDR:03837nam a22003975i 4500 001 988560
003 DE-He213
005 20200703102538.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319979038 $9 978-3-319-97903-8
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-97903-8
050 4 $a P99-P99.4
072 7 $a GTE $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LIT006000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a GTD $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 401.4 $2 23
100 1 $a Cimatti, Felice. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1210965
245 1 2 $a A Biosemiotic Ontology $h [electronic resource] : $b The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi / $c by Felice Cimatti.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a V, 159 p. 20 illus., 6 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Biosemiotics, $x 1875-4651 ; $v 18
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Life -- Chapter 3. Scientist because Philosopher, Philosopher because Scientist -- Chapter 4. The Line and the Circle -- Chapter 5. The Biological Model: for an anti-Cartesian semiotics -- Chapter 6. Of the Complementarity of the Sign -- Chapter 7. The Origin of Language -- Chapter 8. Attention and Consciousness -- Chapter 9. Breaking the Circle -- Chapter 10. Language and Ethics -- Chapter 11. The “Darkness” Between Aesthetics and the Sacred -- Chapter 12. Conclusion: Prodi and Italian Thought.
520 $a Giorgio Prodi (1928-1987) was an important Italian scientist who developed an original philosophy based on two basic assumptions: 1. life is mainly a semiotic phenomenon; 2. matter is somewhat a semiotic phenomenon. Prodi applies Peirce's cenopythagorean categories to all phenomena of life and matter: Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. They are interconnected meaning that the very ontology of the world, according to Prodi, is somewhat semiotic. In fact, when one describes matter as “made of” Firstness and Secondness, this means that matter ‘intrinsically’ implies semiotics (with Thirdness also being present in the world). At the very heart of Prodi’s theory lies a metaphysical hypothesis which is an ambitious theoretical gesture that places Prodi in an awkward position with respect to the customary philosophical tradition. In fact, his own ontology is neither dualistic nor monistic. Such a conclusion is unusual and weird, but much less unusual in present time than it was when it was first introduced. The actual resurgence of various “realisms” make Prodi’s semiotic realism much more interesting than when he first proposed his philosophical approach. What is uncommon, in Prodi perspective, is that he never separated semiotics from the materiality of the world. Prodi does not agree with the “standard” structuralist view of semiosis as an artificial and unnatural activity. On the contrary, Prodi believed semiosis (that is, the interconnection between Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness) lies at the very bottom of life. On one hand, Prodi maintains a strong realist stance; on the other, a realism that includes semiosis as ‘natural’ phenomena. This last view is very unusual because all forms, more or less, of realism exclude semiosis from nature but they frequently “reduce” semiosis to non-semiotic elements. According to Prodi, semiosis is a completely natural phenomenon.
650 0 $a Semiotics. $3 559892
650 0 $a Ontology. $3 559386
650 0 $a Philosophy of mind. $3 555804
650 0 $a Life sciences. $3 815602
650 0 $a Logic. $3 558909
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 668203
650 2 4 $a Life Sciences, general. $3 668532
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319979021
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319979045
830 0 $a Biosemiotics, $x 1875-4651 ; $v 13 $3 1255269
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8
912 $a ZDB-2-SBL
912 $a ZDB-2-SXB
950 $a Biomedical and Life Sciences (SpringerNature-11642)
950 $a Biomedical and Life Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43708)