國立虎尾科技大學 |

Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity = In the Aftermath of Plagiarism /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity/ by M. V. Dougherty.
Reminder of title:	In the Aftermath of Plagiarism /
Author:	Dougherty, M. V.
Description:	XV, 248 p. 5 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Research—Moral and ethical aspects. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2
ISBN:	9783319994352

Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity = In the Aftermath of Plagiarism /
Dougherty, M. V.

Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research IntegrityIn the Aftermath of Plagiarism /[electronic resource] :by M. V. Dougherty. - 1st ed. 2018. - XV, 248 p. 5 illus.online resource. - Research Ethics Forum,62212-9529 ;. - Research Ethics Forum,3.

Preface -- Introduction -- 1. Defining the Scholarly Record -- 2. What is Academic Plagiarism? -- 3. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy -- 4. Academic Whistleblowing -- 5. Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases -- 6. Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record -- Conclusion: Beyond the Published Retraction -- Index.

This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.

ISBN: 9783319994352

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1266699
Research—Moral and ethical aspects.

LC Class. No.: BJ1-1725

Dewey Class. No.: 174.9

Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity = In the Aftermath of Plagiarism /
LDR:03164nam a22004095i 4500 001 988664
003 DE-He213
005 20200704095018.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319994352 $9 978-3-319-99435-2
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-99435-2
050 4 $a BJ1-1725
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 174.9 $2 23
100 1 $a Dougherty, M. V. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 802560
245 1 0 $a Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity $h [electronic resource] : $b In the Aftermath of Plagiarism / $c by M. V. Dougherty.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a XV, 248 p. 5 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Research Ethics Forum, $x 2212-9529 ; $v 6
505 0 $a Preface -- Introduction -- 1. Defining the Scholarly Record -- 2. What is Academic Plagiarism? -- 3. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy -- 4. Academic Whistleblowing -- 5. Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases -- 6. Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record -- Conclusion: Beyond the Published Retraction -- Index.
520 $a This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.
650 0 $a Research—Moral and ethical aspects. $3 1266699
650 0 $a Study skills. $3 555060
650 0 $a Printing. $3 599714
650 0 $a Publishers and publishing. $3 572437
650 1 4 $a Research Ethics. $3 1106279
650 2 4 $a Research Skills. $3 1204754
650 2 4 $a Printing and Publishing. $3 669578
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319994345
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319994369
830 0 $a Research Ethics Forum, $x 2212-9529 ; $v 3 $3 1271157
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)