國立虎尾科技大學 |

Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project/ edited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton.
other author:	Finder, Stuart G.
Description:	XI, 228 p. 2 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Ethics. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
ISBN:	9783319909554

Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project
Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project[electronic resource] /edited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton. - 1st ed. 2018. - XI, 228 p. 2 illus.online resource.

Introduction; Bliton & Finder -- Case Scenario; Finder -- Critical commentary on scenario; Armstrong, Frolic & Rubin, Hynds, Rosell & Johnson, Tarzian, Tsai -- Method; Agich, Aulisio, Hurst, Rasmussen -- Critical commentary on method; Bishop, Molewijk, Reiter-Theil -- Conclusion – Bliton & Finder.

Open Access

This open access book about the Zadeh Project demonstrates and explores a core question in clinical ethics: how can ethics consultants be accountable in the face of a robust plurality of ethical standpoints, especially those that underwrite practices and methods for doing ethics consultation as well as those viewpoints and values encountered in daily clinical ethics practice? Underscoring this question is the recognition that the field of clinical ethics consultation has arrived at a crucial point in its maturation. Many efforts are underway to more formally “professionalize” the field, with most aimed toward stabilizing a specific set of institutional considerations. Stretched between these institutional and practical initiatives resides a crucial set of of ethical considerations, chief among them the meaning and scope of responsibility for clinical ethics consultants. Developed around a long-form case scenario, the Zadeh Project provides a multi-layered series of “peer-reviews”: critique of the actions of the case scenario’s ethics consultant; reflection on clinical ethics method; examination of the many ways that commitments to method and practice can, and do, intersect, overlap, and alter one another. The design and format of this book thus models a key element for clinical ethics practice: the need and ability to provide careful and thoughtful explanation of core moral considerations that emerge among diverse standpoints. Specifically designed for those studying to become and those who are ethics consultants, this book, with its innovative and multi-layered approach, allows readers to share a peer-review-like experience that shows accountability to be what it is, an ethical, not merely procedural or administrative, undertaking.

ISBN: 9783319909554

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

555769
Ethics.

LC Class. No.: BJ1-1725

Dewey Class. No.: 170

Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project
LDR:03536nam a22004215i 4500 001 989447
003 DE-He213
005 20200701215504.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319909554 $9 978-3-319-90955-4
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-90955-4
050 4 $a BJ1-1725
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 170 $2 23
245 1 0 $a Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a XI, 228 p. 2 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Introduction; Bliton & Finder -- Case Scenario; Finder -- Critical commentary on scenario; Armstrong, Frolic & Rubin, Hynds, Rosell & Johnson, Tarzian, Tsai -- Method; Agich, Aulisio, Hurst, Rasmussen -- Critical commentary on method; Bishop, Molewijk, Reiter-Theil -- Conclusion – Bliton & Finder.
506 0 $a Open Access
520 $a This open access book about the Zadeh Project demonstrates and explores a core question in clinical ethics: how can ethics consultants be accountable in the face of a robust plurality of ethical standpoints, especially those that underwrite practices and methods for doing ethics consultation as well as those viewpoints and values encountered in daily clinical ethics practice? Underscoring this question is the recognition that the field of clinical ethics consultation has arrived at a crucial point in its maturation. Many efforts are underway to more formally “professionalize” the field, with most aimed toward stabilizing a specific set of institutional considerations. Stretched between these institutional and practical initiatives resides a crucial set of of ethical considerations, chief among them the meaning and scope of responsibility for clinical ethics consultants. Developed around a long-form case scenario, the Zadeh Project provides a multi-layered series of “peer-reviews”: critique of the actions of the case scenario’s ethics consultant; reflection on clinical ethics method; examination of the many ways that commitments to method and practice can, and do, intersect, overlap, and alter one another. The design and format of this book thus models a key element for clinical ethics practice: the need and ability to provide careful and thoughtful explanation of core moral considerations that emerge among diverse standpoints. Specifically designed for those studying to become and those who are ethics consultants, this book, with its innovative and multi-layered approach, allows readers to share a peer-review-like experience that shows accountability to be what it is, an ethical, not merely procedural or administrative, undertaking.
650 0 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 0 $a Health administration. $3 1105247
650 2 4 $a Health Administration. $3 677396
700 1 $a Finder, Stuart G. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1209741
700 1 $a Bliton, Mark J. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1209742
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319909530
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319909547
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030081409
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90955-4
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
912 $a ZDB-2-SOB
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)