語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Precedent and Statute = Lawmaking in...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Precedent and Statute = Lawmaking in the Courts versus Lawmaking in Parliament /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Precedent and Statute/ by Orlin Yalnazov.
其他題名:
Lawmaking in the Courts versus Lawmaking in Parliament /
作者:
Yalnazov, Orlin.
面頁冊數:
XI, 345 p. 7 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:
Springer Nature eBook
標題:
Law and economics. -
電子資源:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
ISBN:
9783658243852
Precedent and Statute = Lawmaking in the Courts versus Lawmaking in Parliament /
Yalnazov, Orlin.
Precedent and Statute
Lawmaking in the Courts versus Lawmaking in Parliament /[electronic resource] :by Orlin Yalnazov. - 1st ed. 2018. - XI, 345 p. 7 illus.online resource. - Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts | Economic Analysis of Law ,2524-7360. - Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts | Economic Analysis of Law ,.
Two Types of Legal Uncertainty -- Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction -- Fact, Law, and Legal Change -- Remoteness in Contract -- Metarules versus Metastandards -- Precedent in the Civil and Common Law.
Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The ‘technologies’ between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the ‘efficiency of the common law’ hypothesis. Contents Two Types of Legal Uncertainty Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction Fact, Law, and Legal Change Remoteness in Contract Metarules versus Metastandards Precedent in the Civil and Common Law Target Groups Researchers, students, and practitioners in the fields of law, economics, and legal philosophy The Author Orlin Yalnazov was born in Varna. He holds a PhD in Law & Economics, awarded jointly by Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universität Hamburg, and Universitá di Bologna, as well as an LLM from the University of Cambridge and an LLB from Durham University. He works at the University of Hull.
ISBN: 9783658243852
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
560301
Law and economics.
LC Class. No.: HB73
Dewey Class. No.: 330
Precedent and Statute = Lawmaking in the Courts versus Lawmaking in Parliament /
LDR
:03109nam a22004095i 4500
001
991322
003
DE-He213
005
20200701025512.0
007
cr nn 008mamaa
008
201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020
$a
9783658243852
$9
978-3-658-24385-2
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-658-24385-2
050
4
$a
HB73
072
7
$a
LBBM
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LAW014000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
LBBM
$2
thema
072
7
$a
LNC
$2
thema
082
0 4
$a
330
$2
23
100
1
$a
Yalnazov, Orlin.
$4
aut
$4
http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
$3
1210325
245
1 0
$a
Precedent and Statute
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
Lawmaking in the Courts versus Lawmaking in Parliament /
$c
by Orlin Yalnazov.
250
$a
1st ed. 2018.
264
1
$a
Wiesbaden :
$b
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :
$b
Imprint: Springer Gabler,
$c
2018.
300
$a
XI, 345 p. 7 illus.
$b
online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
347
$a
text file
$b
PDF
$2
rda
490
1
$a
Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts | Economic Analysis of Law ,
$x
2524-7360
505
0
$a
Two Types of Legal Uncertainty -- Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction -- Fact, Law, and Legal Change -- Remoteness in Contract -- Metarules versus Metastandards -- Precedent in the Civil and Common Law.
520
$a
Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The ‘technologies’ between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the ‘efficiency of the common law’ hypothesis. Contents Two Types of Legal Uncertainty Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction Fact, Law, and Legal Change Remoteness in Contract Metarules versus Metastandards Precedent in the Civil and Common Law Target Groups Researchers, students, and practitioners in the fields of law, economics, and legal philosophy The Author Orlin Yalnazov was born in Varna. He holds a PhD in Law & Economics, awarded jointly by Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universität Hamburg, and Universitá di Bologna, as well as an LLM from the University of Cambridge and an LLB from Durham University. He works at the University of Hull.
650
0
$a
Law and economics.
$3
560301
650
1 4
$a
Law and Economics.
$3
669261
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer Nature eBook
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783658243845
776
0 8
$i
Printed edition:
$z
9783658243869
830
0
$a
Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts | Economic Analysis of Law ,
$x
2524-7360
$3
1282979
856
4 0
$u
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
912
$a
ZDB-2-ECF
912
$a
ZDB-2-SXEF
950
$a
Economics and Finance (SpringerNature-41170)
950
$a
Economics and Finance (R0) (SpringerNature-43720)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入