國立虎尾科技大學 |

A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures = Does Mareva Rule the Waves? /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures/ by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski.
其他題名:	Does Mareva Rule the Waves? /
作者:	Tajti, Tibor.
其他作者:	Iglikowski, Peter.
面頁冊數:	XIII, 89 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Private international law. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7
ISBN:	9783319943497

A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures = Does Mareva Rule the Waves? /
Tajti, Tibor.

A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional MeasuresDoes Mareva Rule the Waves? /[electronic resource] :by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski. - 1st ed. 2018. - XIII, 89 p.online resource. - SpringerBriefs in Law,2192-855X. - SpringerBriefs in Law,.

Introduction -- Provisional measures in France and the United Kingdom -- Provisional measures in the United States -- Post-socialist jurisdictions: Provisional measures in Hungary -- The European account preservation order: Nuclear weapon or paper tiger? -- Conclusions and possible ways forward.

This book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the “age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth” has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the ‘Freezing Order’ in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.

ISBN: 9783319943497

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1202562
Private international law.

LC Class. No.: K7000-7720.22

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures = Does Mareva Rule the Waves? /
LDR:02896nam a22004335i 4500 001 994854
003 DE-He213
005 20200706020738.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319943497 $9 978-3-319-94349-7
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-94349-7
050 4 $a K7000-7720.22
050 4 $a K7073-7078
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 340.2 $2 23
100 1 $a Tajti, Tibor. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1206272
245 1 2 $a A Cross Border Study of Freezing Orders and Provisional Measures $h [electronic resource] : $b Does Mareva Rule the Waves? / $c by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a XIII, 89 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in Law, $x 2192-855X
505 0 $a Introduction -- Provisional measures in France and the United Kingdom -- Provisional measures in the United States -- Post-socialist jurisdictions: Provisional measures in Hungary -- The European account preservation order: Nuclear weapon or paper tiger? -- Conclusions and possible ways forward.
520 $a This book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the “age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth” has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the ‘Freezing Order’ in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a Commercial law. $3 560158
650 0 $a Law—Europe. $3 1254279
650 0 $a International law. $3 557047
650 0 $a Trade. $3 1019351
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . $3 1209897
650 2 4 $a Business Law. $3 1114627
650 2 4 $a European Law. $3 883672
650 2 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 882440
700 1 $a Iglikowski, Peter. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1206273
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319943480
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319943503
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in Law, $x 2192-855X $3 1256719
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)