國立虎尾科技大學 |

Logical Form = Between Logic and Natural Language /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Logical Form/ by Andrea Iacona.
其他題名:	Between Logic and Natural Language /
作者:	Iacona, Andrea.
面頁冊數:	VIII, 133 p.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Logic. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3
ISBN:	9783319741543

Logical Form = Between Logic and Natural Language /
Iacona, Andrea.

Logical FormBetween Logic and Natural Language /[electronic resource] :by Andrea Iacona. - 1st ed. 2018. - VIII, 133 p.online resource. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,3930166-6991 ;. - Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,359.

Preface -- 1. The early history of logical form -- 2. The ideal of logical perfection -- 3. Formal languages and natural languages -- 4. Logical form and syntactic structure -- 5. Logical form and truth conditions -- 6. Logical knowledge vs knowledge of logical form -- 7. Validity -- 8. Quanti ed sentences -- 9. Further issues concerning quanti cation -- Afterword.

Logical form has always been a prime concern for philosophers belonging to the analytic tradition. For at least one century, the study of logical form has been widely adopted as a method of investigation, relying on its capacity to reveal the structure of thoughts or the constitution of facts. This book focuses on the very idea of logical form, which is directly relevant to any principled reflection on that method. Its central thesis is that there is no such thing as a correct answer to the question of what is logical form: two significantly different notions of logical form are needed to fulfill two major theoretical roles that pertain respectively to logic and to semantics. This thesis has a negative and a positive side. The negative side is that a deeply rooted presumption about logical form turns out to be overly optimistic: there is no unique notion of logical form that can play both roles. The positive side is that the distinction between two notions of logical form, once properly spelled out, sheds light on some fundamental issues concerning the relation between logic and language.

ISBN: 9783319741543

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

558909
Logic.

LC Class. No.: BC1-199

Dewey Class. No.: 160

Logical Form = Between Logic and Natural Language /
LDR:02914nam a22004095i 4500 001 995253
003 DE-He213
005 20200813143052.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319741543 $9 978-3-319-74154-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-74154-3
050 4 $a BC1-199
072 7 $a HPL $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI011000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTL $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 160 $2 23
100 1 $a Iacona, Andrea. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1073692
245 1 0 $a Logical Form $h [electronic resource] : $b Between Logic and Natural Language / $c by Andrea Iacona.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a VIII, 133 p. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 393
505 0 $a Preface -- 1. The early history of logical form -- 2. The ideal of logical perfection -- 3. Formal languages and natural languages -- 4. Logical form and syntactic structure -- 5. Logical form and truth conditions -- 6. Logical knowledge vs knowledge of logical form -- 7. Validity -- 8. Quanti ed sentences -- 9. Further issues concerning quanti cation -- Afterword.
520 $a Logical form has always been a prime concern for philosophers belonging to the analytic tradition. For at least one century, the study of logical form has been widely adopted as a method of investigation, relying on its capacity to reveal the structure of thoughts or the constitution of facts. This book focuses on the very idea of logical form, which is directly relevant to any principled reflection on that method. Its central thesis is that there is no such thing as a correct answer to the question of what is logical form: two significantly different notions of logical form are needed to fulfill two major theoretical roles that pertain respectively to logic and to semantics. This thesis has a negative and a positive side. The negative side is that a deeply rooted presumption about logical form turns out to be overly optimistic: there is no unique notion of logical form that can play both roles. The positive side is that the distinction between two notions of logical form, once properly spelled out, sheds light on some fundamental issues concerning the relation between logic and language.
650 0 $a Logic. $3 558909
650 0 $a Semantics. $3 555362
650 0 $a Language and languages—Philosophy. $3 1254282
650 0 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 0 $a Mathematical logic. $2 bicssc $3 810627
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Language. $3 671588
650 2 4 $a History of Philosophy. $3 671574
650 2 4 $a Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages. $3 670059
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319741536
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319741550
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319892719
830 0 $a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v 359 $3 1257256
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74154-3
912 $a ZDB-2-REP
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPR
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)
950 $a Philosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)